• 19 Posts
  • 551 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 13th, 2023

help-circle


  • Agriculture went from employing the majority of the populace to 2%. We found jobs for everyone.

    Sure, over the course of like 200 years. Can you not see how that is fundamentally different?

    There are many professions that have immense latent demand that people simply cannot afford

    “Afford” is doing a lot of work in your sentence. How do you think people are going to be able to afford more? Workers aren’t going to be making more money, and the workers who enter these professions are going to be making a lot less money.

    Labor force participation is a better metric here

    No, it really isn’t.
    Labour force participation rate is “how many working age people want a job” even if they’re unemployed.
    Unemployment rate tells you “how much of the labour force can get a job” which is what we actually care about. Can you get a job if you want one. More people need jobs (as you have shown) but fewer percentage of those people are able to get jobs (as I’ve shown).\


  • The automation that AI is promising (but not necessarily delivering) is fundamentally different than the automation that came before.

    Remember; the luddites were right but their industry was small enough that the displaced labour could be absorbed by other industries.

    Not only is AI affecting almost every artistic and white-collar industry, but the cap-ex barrier to entry is way lower than for any other automation effort in the past. No need to buy expensive machines, or create whole new production lines just to test it out. Computers used to take up an entire room to do the work of a handful of people. If you can increase productivity but there is no associated increase in demand, then what you get is layoffs.

    The amount of workers that this has the potential to displace far outstrips the industry/economy/society’s ability to replace with “new careers” (that we’ve yet to see materialize). And I challenge your assertion that automation has resulted in increased demand for human labour, do we significantly less unemployment on average? Over the last 70 years (in the USA for ex) unemployment has been trending up.

    What we have seen is a total gutting of employee bargaining power.











  • None of those really “feel like” the things they’re replacing. I don’t really even think that should be the goal. They occupy the same space, though, and the infographic would look stupid if it showed all the options in some category, so they just picked a popular proprietary/centralized one, and a popular federated alternative in the same category. In this case discord is a popular chat app, and the most popular federa chat app afaict is matrix.





  • It’s illegal to hire people or refuse to hire people based on political beliefs or affiliation, so you’re not gonna have companies that only employ Trump supporters or employ no Trump supporters. Politics is considered a protected group wrt employment law in the USA and many countries.

    But how would it actually work?
    It’s not like it’s difficult to gauge employee sentiment about ICE. If your employees are strongly against it, then you simply don’t enter the competition for ICE contracts, or you choose to not renew the contracts when they expire.