If I’m not mistaken, people who said they don’t have any are beeing held for questioning and interrogations, or maybe even denied access. I vaguely remember reading an article about this a while back, so it may not help you as much as you think.
They can (how long can they hold you based on suspicion alone?) and will cause you a lot of trouble if they don’t like what you give them.
I’d say that’s because here on Lemmy, we already don’t give a fuck about and wouldn’t touch Chrome or Edge with a ten foot pole, but some of us trusted Mozzila, which is now starting to do dumb AI shit. And having your trust broken hurts.
Astroturfing would not be recommending LibreWolf as an alternative.
If you look into alternatives, Brave is one that’s usually mentioned but there’s always someone quickly posting all of the dumb shit they did.
It’s sad to see that we’re heading towards a future where people can’t read a text longer than one summarized paragraph, and write anything longer than a sentence without using LLMs.
Children are already skipping learning of very important skills by offloading it to AI in school.
There are some ways how to get around NAC. If it’s older 802.1x, you can use https://github.com/s0lst1c3/silentbridge, but what usually works for us is simply cloning the printer MAC, because older printers can’t do authentication and rely on MAC whitelisting.
Making a MITM device that just clones the MAC when you plug it between the printer and the network isn’t that difficult.
But I agree, NAC is important!
It depends on how well segmented is their network, but all you might need for that is a Raspbery PI with ethernet and GSM.
I’ve done some engagements where we sent someone into the company to get in as an air conditioning tech, and when they got in he planted that device between a printer and the network. It was set up to forward all traffic, but also allowed us to connect through GSM and get into the network.
It takes like a few seconds to plant it.
Or if it’s really bad, then you might be able to reach it from the WiFi.
I’ve done exactly that, worked as a Red Team Lead, and the success rate is pretty disturbing. That, and vishing - calling people from the company you find on Linkedin from a spoofed number of their IT that they fucked something up and need to download and run this .exe to fix it before The Audit that’s currently happening notices it.
Even if we do internal infrastructure tests where they let you in, switch AVs to “detect mode” instead of “block mode” and the goal is to find as many unpatched systems/vulnerabilities as you can (instead of, well, testing the AV solution), what we usually do is run a password spray for all domain accounts with a combinations (you can try like 3 to not lock the accounts) of “<month><year><companyname>” we every single time got at least few accounts.
Fortunately this kind of tests are getting more popular, and passwords such as this should’ve definitely been caught in some kind of security test. But it is also pretty depressing, when you repeat the same test next year, and 80% of the passwords are still the same, and vulnerabilities are still not patched.
My absolutely favorite take about art is the one from the edge of the 19->20th century, where they got obsessed about art having to be absolutely separated from reality, to be even worth considering, since that would only taint it, and just be perfect.
So in that case, I have no issues with separating the art from the artist. Or, since they also tried to make art out of their lives (the whole dandy thing), which made basically professional posers, I also don’t mind separating morality/reality from the artists and viewing their life as art. For example, Motley Crue were extremely bad people to be around, but their lifestyle was portrayed well enough that it does sound kinda fun (as long as you don’t actually live like that in reality), so I don’t judge and kind of appreciate them trying.
On the other hand, if someone is a dick as an artist without their behavior being refined enough to pass as an art/pose/dandyism, I make sure to not give them any money whatsoever, or promote their products, and just shittalk and laugh at them. Even if their actuall art is good, which I will probably enjoy, but will definitely not pay for.
Is it a good take on the question that makes sense? Probably not, but it does work for me.
Shadowrun kind of does the same. It’s not really super-advanced, since it’s cyberpunk, but it’s cyberpunk with magic. And it’s my favorite setting, it’s such a cool idea.
Isn’t this actually illeagal in the EU?
I think I know who killed him.
By 11, he was programming on his own—a skill he used to playfully torment his friends. One remembers Balaji’s idea of a middle-school prank: writing code that deleted a friend’s Skyrim save file.
Isn’t the OpenAI one they offer the same one as the one provided at https://chatgpt.com/ without login? So probably something not as impactful.
Or do they share their unlimited subscription?
That’s only for the 200$ one, and if you use it constantly, no?
lol, I love it. I’m thinking about paying for DeepSeek even though I hate AI bullshit, just to spite all the panicking AI tech scammers. This has seriously made my week, the amount of copium they are inhaling is insanely funny :D
I’ve seen this warning in a lot of apps, like Teams, Messenger or some authenticators, and some of the time I could simply ignore it and continue using the app. I think some of apps simply use it for push notifications that I can get by without.
Not all, though. Sometimes it simply doesn’t work.
I tried it like a year ago, maybe more, and it wasn’t ready for that. The battery life was awfull (which was a SW issue of the OS not being able to stand-by properly), and accepting calls wasn’t really reliable. It’s more of a gimmick and great as a side-phone, but I wouldn’t use it as a daily driver.
But the situation might’ve changed.
I can do that and more on my Pinephone running Kali Nethunter. While it’s mostly a gimmick with awfull battery life, I’ve already used it a few times mostly in regards to wifi pentesting for my cyber-sec job, i.e when going to lunch onsite and you notice a new wifi AP you didn’t see when inside the office you’re working on.
And since it has an USB-C, I can simply plug in a dock with two USB-As, Ethernet, PD and HDMI, to turn it into a full-fledged Kali desktop.
I’d also add that IMO, it’s also heavily caused by misalignment of social network personalization algorithms. It’s very probable that someone developed a ML algorithm during the early years of FB/YT/Google (not LLM, just some kind of feedbacky ML), that takes data they have about you as input, and selects what posts to show you next to maximize your time spent scrolling on the app.
You have unimaginable amount of data (with literally billions of active users), and it could’ve been running and getting better for the last decade.
The algorithm gets better and better at gluing you to the screen, at manipulating and changing people. My theory is that one of the best ways how to keep someone glued to a social network is radicalization and introduction into a conspiraci theory. It probably removes you from “normal” people around you IRL, because you’re now wierd, you feel smart because you’ve “figured out the truth”, you don’t spend time with people around you or read “traditional” media, because they are lying and don’t get you, and the only safe space you have is the echo chamber on the social network. That sounds like a pretty good recipe how to keep people interacting on the platform, and there’s not really a way how to prevent it, assuming it’s a ML algorithm driving it. No one knows how it works, and it only works with one goal - maximize app time at all costs.
Just take a look how good some ML models are at the task of “text -> image”. Now imagine it has billions of people and a decade to experiment, with a task “person -> next content to show”. It’s horrifying to think about what it would be able to manipulate you into, and it is even better at it that the image models, because it had exponentially more data and room to experiment in real time on real people.
Also - there’s no way how to fight back. Even if you know about it, there are tens of thousands people like you, who are also “immune” to this approach. But the ML algorithm gets to experiment on them, and if there is a way how to manipulate even them, it will figure it out. Because it knows what approach won’t work on people like you. The only way you can prevent this is by not using anything that has a personalized feed - no Google search, no FB wall, no YT recommendations, etc. This probably doesn’t lead to radicalization in this case, because the goal is to keep you in the app, not radicalize. For now, at least. Thankfully, people managing the biggest social networks are reasonable people who are just running a business, and they have no reason to change the goal of the algorithm into something else than screen time, right?
Thank you, it was an interesting read.
Unfortunately, as I was looking more into it, I’ve stumbled upon a paper that points out some key problems with the proof. I haven’t looked into it more and tbh my expertise in formal math ends at vague memories from CS degree almost 10 years ago, but the points do seem to make sense.
Lol. We’re as far away from getting to AGI as we were before the whole LLM craze. It’s just glorified statistical text prediction, no matter how much data you throw at it, it will still just guess what’s the next most likely letter/token based on what’s before it, that can’t even get it’s facts straith without bullshitting.
If we ever get it, it won’t be through LLMs.
I hope someone will finally mathematically prove that it’s impossible with current algorithms, so we can finally be done with this bullshiting.
I had no idea, and this hurts. I have a few, but fond, memories about DeviantArt when I had a short phase on highschool where I was drawing for a bit (which was more than 10 years ago). It didn’t last long, but DeviantArt was a large part of it.
Hearing they are commiting to AI art - THE platform for actual artists (at least it was, 10 years ago), who AI hurts the most, is insane. That’s pure betrayal. I hate this.