compostgoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agoMeta appoints anti-LGBTQ+ conspiracy theorist Robby Starbuck as AI bias advisorwww.thepinknews.comexternal-linkmessage-square153linkfedilinkarrow-up1798arrow-down118cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1780arrow-down1external-linkMeta appoints anti-LGBTQ+ conspiracy theorist Robby Starbuck as AI bias advisorwww.thepinknews.comcompostgoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square153linkfedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
minus-squaredb2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up31arrow-down2·10 months agoThat doesn’t disprove my statement.
minus-squareFloodedwomb@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down6·10 months agoNo, but it knocks a little wind out of the sail.
minus-squareripcord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·10 months agoOK, but it’s a really weird - and I think unhelpful - way for people to keep framing reality. Like we’re trying to pretend it’s just some story.
minus-squareFloodedwomb@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·10 months agoYes, it doesn’t help that it’s an incredibly cliche piece of terminology.
minus-squareOrteilGenou@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down2·edit-210 months agoWe’re in the dumbest possible Lemmy chat string
minus-squareFloodedwomb@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·10 months agoIf there’s only one time line, and you assert that it is the dumbest time line, it follows that it is also the smartest time line. Thereby rendering the statement null. Its not unproven, but neither does it matter.
minus-squarecabillaud@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·10 months agoThat is a good example of talking to say nothing imo
That doesn’t disprove my statement.
No, but it knocks a little wind out of the sail.
Not even a little.
OK, but it’s a really weird - and I think unhelpful - way for people to keep framing reality. Like we’re trying to pretend it’s just some story.
Yes, it doesn’t help that it’s an incredibly cliche piece of terminology.
That too.
We’re in the dumbest possible Lemmy chat string
If there’s only one time line, and you assert that it is the dumbest time line, it follows that it is also the smartest time line. Thereby rendering the statement null. Its not unproven, but neither does it matter.
That is a good example of talking to say nothing imo