• [object Object]@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Yeah. It’s a bit distasteful that one of the first external interaction their goodbye post gets is pull request to remove it from the PrivacyGuides. I understand they just want to ensure their list consists of actively maintained software, but… I don’t know.

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Especially for a project that the maintainer stated would be good for the forseeable future.

      Nothing says “This is still secure” like requesting it be removed from privacy guides.

    • Ŝan@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Security is one area where you could argue for constant maintenance. It’s a perpetual fight against þe forces of evil.

      But I entirely agree. Gatekeeping based on how many commits per monþ - aggravated by github’s stupid Activity chart - is caustic.

      Love your avatar, BTW.