• Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    To solve the issue of identifying the capabilities of the cable: CaberQ.
    Though a bit expensive for what it is.

    • MisterD@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      https://caberqu.com/home/20-43-c2c-caberqu-746052578813.html#/27-with_or_without_case-with_case It’s not awful for price but there are more complete testers like treedix: https://treedix.com/

      What bothers me is all these testers assume you are a USB hardware wizard and know which pin combo supports which USB standard.

      I want something that tells you how fast and how much power the wire can handle.

      The newer cables have chips to talk to chargers to not exceed the power ratings. Why can’t these chips or testers also tell you how fast the wire can handle?

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        What bothers me is all these testers assume you are a USB hardware wizard and know which pin combo supports which USB standard.

        The CaberQ can do exactly that.

      • JayGray91🐉🍕@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I thought I was smart going back to a video that featured two USB C cable testers. I onky watched the video and didnt check or paid attention what the brand was.

        They are, in fact, these exact two brands.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Would have been nice for some kind of forethought on a labeling system.

      But there’s so many combinations now of power, data, audio, and video, and sup glasses of thunderbolt, display port, HDMI. Even if you put a 4-digit code on every cable listing exactly what they support people would never be able to understand and track down backward compatibility.

      I’d be surprised in the next port change if we don’t end up with some fiber optic in there.