Pro@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoJudge Rules Training AI on Authors' Books Is Legal But Pirating Them Is Notaifray.comexternal-linkmessage-square254fedilinkarrow-up1642arrow-down17
arrow-up1635arrow-down1external-linkJudge Rules Training AI on Authors' Books Is Legal But Pirating Them Is Notaifray.comPro@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square254fedilink
minus-squaregaja@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·18 hours agoI’ve hand calculated forward propagation (neural networks). AI does not learn, its statically optimized. AI “learning” is curve fitting. Human learning requires understanding, which AI is not capable of.
minus-squarenednobbins@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 hour ago Human learning requires understanding, which AI is not capable of. How could anyone know this? Is there some test of understanding that humans can pass and AIs can’t? And if there are humans who can’t pass it, do we consider then unintelligent? We don’t even need to set the bar that high. Is there some definition of “understanding” that humans meet and AIs don’t?
I’ve hand calculated forward propagation (neural networks). AI does not learn, its statically optimized. AI “learning” is curve fitting. Human learning requires understanding, which AI is not capable of.
How could anyone know this?
Is there some test of understanding that humans can pass and AIs can’t? And if there are humans who can’t pass it, do we consider then unintelligent?
We don’t even need to set the bar that high. Is there some definition of “understanding” that humans meet and AIs don’t?