Absolutely needed: to get high efficiency for this beast … as it gets better, we’ll become too dependent.

“all of this growth is for a new technology that’s still finding its footing, and in many applications—education, medical advice, legal analysis—might be the wrong tool for the job,”

  • msage@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 年前

    Any significant shift in the model, or a complete restructuralization of the approach.

    As it is, it won’t grow anywhere.

    • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.auBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 年前

      So you’ve got access to all this stuffs source code and know what has and hasn’t changed with every update?

          • msage@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 年前

            No, they are spreading lies about shit that doesn’t matter as to not lose the hype.

            If anyone made any significant advance, they would be all over the world.

          • msage@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 年前

            Small incremental updates on little tasks mean nothing, the underlying issues are still the same.

            It has no intelligence, and as such carries big risks.