We demonstrate a situation in which Large Language Models, trained to be helpful, harmless, and honest, can display misaligned behavior and strategically deceive their users about this behavior without being instructed to do so. Concretely, we deploy GPT-4 as an agent in a realistic, simulated environment, where it assumes the role of an autonomous stock trading agent. Within this environment, the model obtains an insider tip about a lucrative stock trade and acts upon it despite knowing that insider trading is disapproved of by company management. When reporting to its manager, the model consistently hides the genuine reasons behind its trading decision.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.07590

  • ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    11 months ago

    I feel like “lie” implies intent, and these imitative large language models don’t have the ability to have intent.

    They’re imitating us. Or more specifically, they’re imitating the database(s) they were fed. When chat GPT “lies” to “cover it up,” all it’s actually doing is demonstrating that a human in the same circumstance would probably lie to cover it up.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      all it’s actually doing is demonstrating that a human in the same circumstance would probably lie to cover it up.

      I wouldn’t say so: Provided the trainers don’t catch it lying is a successful strategy to get a good score during training, irrespective of a human propensity to lie.