Pope Francis on Saturday forcibly removed the bishop of Tyler, Texas, a firebrand conservative prelate active on social media who has been a fierce critic of the pontiff and has come to symbolize the polarization within the U.S. Catholic hierarchy.

A one-line statement from the Vatican said Francis had “relieved” Bishop Joseph Strickland of the pastoral governance of Tyler and appointed the bishop of Austin as the temporary administrator.

Strickland, 65, has emerged as a leading critic of Francis, accusing him in a tweet earlier this year of “undermining the deposit of faith.” He has been particularly critical of Francis’ recent meeting on the future of the Catholic Church during which hot-button issues were discussed, including ways to better welcome LGBTQ+ Catholics.

Earlier this year, the Vatican sent in investigators to look into his governance of the diocese, amid reports that priests and laypeople in Tyler had complained and that he was making unorthodox claims.

  • ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    There’s a heresy called sedevacantism that basically believes the last few Popes don’t count because they’ve taken positions that the real Pope would never take.

    They don’t do the burning at the stake bit anymore though.

    • Rinox@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Some people are lucky that today’s popes don’t act like the popes of the olden days.

      BTW, which one was the last true Pope in theory eyes? I bet it’s the fascist one

      • ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think most of them think the last real pope was Pius XII, and yeah he was the guy who signed the Reichskonkordat with the Nazis, which required priests in Germany to take an oath of loyalty to the German Reich.

        He actually did that as Secretary of State before he became pope, on behalf of the previous pope, so they were both fash.

        The reason sedevacantists dislike his successor, John XXIII, is that they are really upset about the Second Vatican Council introducing ideas like “the beneficial nature of diversity” and “concern for secular human values.” That’s the moment when they think the church went off the rails.

      • Shard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Likely whichever one suits their personal world view of bigotry and fascism.

        Yes, that one that supported the Nazi’s in WWII and gave the names and addresses of Jews to the gestapo.