Xylight@lemdro.id to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 个月前Apparently Bluesky lets you require a sign in to view a postlemdro.idimagemessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up1154arrow-down148file-text
arrow-up1106arrow-down1imageApparently Bluesky lets you require a sign in to view a postlemdro.idXylight@lemdro.id to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 个月前message-square37fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarestinerman@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·4 个月前Not the OP, but I don’t think there’s anything wrong with it. I do think it’s a little odd given that the security is at the client and not in the protocol. As others have mentioned already, if you use skyview.social, you can see the posts anyway.
Not the OP, but I don’t think there’s anything wrong with it. I do think it’s a little odd given that the security is at the client and not in the protocol. As others have mentioned already, if you use skyview.social, you can see the posts anyway.
oh then i guess useless feature for now