• hitmyspot@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Your mistake is to assign any portion of the action to a corporation. They are a legal entity, sure, but they are an empty vessel. They don’t have morals or choice or a conscience. People do. The people doing amoral things are incentivised to do so. They make only a part of the corporation. That’s the point. To act as a collective, and as a shield.

    Remove the incentive for the individuals and for the entity and the problem disappears. It’s not the fault of consumers. It’s a fault of the system. Change the system. Consumers can play a part in that, but that doesn’t make them to blame.

    • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I am aiming my criticism at the individuals, so we agree on that. I would also love to see the incentives change, but no offense, that’s a hand wave. There’s nothing actionable in what you said. Standing up and saying no more is action, and something we can accomplish as individuals. Change comes from people, not from systems. Systems can only change once the people change.

      • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        “No more” is also a hand wave, lol.

        I’m saying change the incentives. That means fines in multiples of the potential profit. I’m saying fines for individuals, not just companies.

        I’m saying put the bad actors out of business with the fines. So the other companies are incentivised not to do it, or they die.

        I’m saying stand up and say no, so it’s a pr nightmare and loss for companies to encroach on our privacies and rights. I’m saying fines for data breaches. Fines for misusing data. Fines for using our likeness.

        • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          All I can say is I really agree with your vision, and while I don’t see a path to get there in the current system, especially as individuals, I hope we can.

          • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Fingers crossed. In the technology space, the path for profitability seems to be to restrict competition and competitor traction.

            Facebook, Google et Al don’t produce a physical product. There is no reason they should be “sticky” as they are. It’s on purpose. They design their products to make it hard to switch from habit and dopamine fixes rather than quality of product. That manipulation should be punishable.

            I think freedom of movement of data should be a requirement. Including using open standards.

            We should also have open information. Companies know how much they made in advertising off users. Users should be aware. It might be eye opening and make more people question the service.