deleted by creator
Removed by mod
Why are we judging what we should do bad on what terrorists are doing instead
Removed by mod
Everyone involved in this discussion in general
Do you genuinely believe that Israel is intentionally killing everyone in Gaza?
If so, why are they so bad at it that civilian casualties aren’t in the hundreds of thousands yet? They have total military superiority. It would be really easy to do that.
Is Israel so incompetent that they can’t “shoot fish in a barrel” or is this take maybe really dumb?
They’re destroyed half of all homes in Gaza and have cut off all access to food and water including bombing UN relief supplies as they come in.
Is your take maybe really dumb?
Source on half of homes destroyed? That is a LOT of bombs.
Source: GOOGLE IT YOURSELF.
I did but nothing seemed to support the claim.
including bombing UN relief supplies as they come in
Weird that UN said trucks, as well as Egyptian aid trucks that Israel negotiated for are still in Gaza then.
Go look up articles that explain why this qualifies as genocide instead of trying to incorrectly nitpick what qualifies as genocide.
It does not qualify as genocide and you’d have to be an idiot to believe any article that suggests it does.
However, it sounds worse if you pretend it is, and that’s all you care about anyway.
In a couple of months when there are still Palestinians in Gaza, I’ll be reminding you of this conversation.
You say that, but, I’m going to go ahead and listen to my training in international relations and law, the well-reasoned arguments based on established legal definitions, and a first-hand witnessing of the evidence in favor of the conclusion, instead of you.
I mean you can believe whatever you want, because it isn’t changing anything, but I don’t think the couple undergrad courses you took makes you better-equipped than the experts and historians who informed my worldview.
So long as you don’t do something crazy like attack random innocent Jews at your next protest, I don’t give a shit about your opinion. I will argue against it online, though. You don’t seem particularly violent so we’re just ships in the night here.
If you have to hide your decisions behind pedantry you know you are in the wrong
Did Canada conduct a genocide against the indigenous?
Yes and so did America
They certainly tried!
No, we didn’t try. We did commit genocide against our indigenous people. Arguably we still are. Genocide does not require the wholesale destruction of a people.
Are you really trying to conflate these two situations?
Just seeing where you draw the line.
or is this take maybe really dumb?
It should be a red flag to stop and revaluate your morals when it comes time to explain why something isn’t genocide.
You can call literally any shit genocide and it would be indefensible to argue otherwise under your logic.
But we aren’t talking about cookie genocide from eating a box of oreos.
People without food, water or electricity are dying in mass to bombings from Isreal and your defending the action by saying it’s not efficient enough to be a genocide. People are dying and you are playing word games.
Seriously. Stop, walk away and really think about what is important to you
I’m not the one playing word games by calling this war genocide.
War is indeed terrible. Civilians, especially the poor, are always the ones suffering the most in any war.
That doesn’t make every war genocide, and that language has consequences.
War is between two armies, so why is Isreal cutting off food, water and electricity to the entire population? Why can’t the people of Gaza leave? Why does Isreal control every facet of life in the strip? Why does Isreal use tanks against kids with rocks?
It’s not war when one side is trapped without basic utilities and the other is a well funded army.
War is between two armies, so why is Isreal cutting off food, water and electricity to the entire population?
This is how war is fought. It is standard US doctrine, for instance.
Why can’t the people of Gaza leave?
Their neighbors won’t take them after some refugees attempted coups and formed terrorist organizations. I personally disagree with viewing all Palestinian refugees as inherently dangerous, but their neighbors do not.
Why does Isreal use tanks against kids with rocks?
They’re using tanks against combined-arms forces that include current-generation, high-tech weaponry. It says a lot about your ignorance of Hamas that you think they’re made up of “kids with rocks.” This isn’t 2014.
7000 people dead and this MF says it’s not enough.
That’s not at all anything I’ve said. I’ve said calling this genocide is ridiculous. Things can be tragically bad and not the worst possible thing.
There is no straight up plan to liquidate Gaza as in a genocide. To suggest there is such a plan is ridiculous, since Israel absolutely could enact such a plan, militarily.
Arguing for less hyperbole and more reality is not an endorsement of anything.
I don’t care how many people on here downvote me or insult me. Discussion should be based on reality. One can express displeasure without making up crazy shit.
This kind of rhetoric is societal poison.
Edit: formatting
According to the UN Office on Genocide Prevention and the Responsibility to Protect a genocide does not require the intended destruction of an entire people. It also doesn’t require a concentrated, physical attack against a people to qualify for genocide.
From their site here: [https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/genocide.shtml]
In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
Killing members of the group;
Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
(Emphasis mine)
Ever since Israel was re-establishee in the wake of WWII, they have grown their borders by violently pushing the Palestinian people out of their homes until now there are only two small territories in which Israel has continued to illegally displace the local Palestinian people and create Israeli settlements. Now Israel is shelling one of those settlements to smithereens and moving in ground troops to occupy the land. They are committing genocide, they have been committing genocide for decades, and they won’t be satisfied until the last vestiges of Palestinian land has been assimilated into their borders.
In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such
I love that you bolded for emphasis part of a paragraph you don’t understand lol.
Fun fact, this part’s also important: national, ethnical, racial or religious group
I bolded it for you just in case.
Also every aspect of this is false.
they have grown their borders by violently pushing the Palestinian people out of their homes until now there are only two small territories in which Israel has continued to illegally displace the local Palestinian people and create Israeli settlements.
There are no settlements in Gaza, and that is not how Israel’s territory expanded.
Are you suggesting that the Palestinian people are not a national, ethnical, racial or religious group? Or did you just bold some words you don’t understand? Also would you care to explain how I don’t understand the parts I bolded? Israel has historically conducted a campaign of violent displacement of the Palestinian people. They’ve murdered them, removed them from their homes, and placed them in ghettos that Israel exercises a great deal of economic control over leading to massive rates of poverty and low access to necessary resources. You’re supporting a state that has and is committing genocide.
Funny how you specify that there are no settlements in Gaza. Is there maybe another Palestinian territory with Israeli settlements that you’re conveniently forgetting to mention?
And yeah, that’s exactly how Israel’s territory expanded.
Are you suggesting that the Palestinian people are not a national, ethnical, racial or religious group?
Hamas is a political entity. Not any of the above.
I recommend using Ten Stages of Genocide
Mind you though, most of these stages are from Palestine’s own doing
The conservatives didn’t gas every single Jew during the holocaust. They had the ability to kill all of them, but they didn’t. They destroyed their lives, but many were not killed. Does that make it any less of a genocide?
Remember, conservatives like to include a bit of plausible deniability in their genocides to help keep everyone on board. This is very obvious genocide with a very thin patina of “plausible” deniability.
The conservatives didn’t gas every single Jew during the holocaust.
Jesus Christ dude can you just be normal for one second.
Israel isn’t invulnerable and even in its hate, arrogance and greed, it knows.
The world can and would turn on them and destroy them.
Israel is invulnerable while the US and most of Europe exists. No one is turning from them. It’s simply not happening.
Oh you just wait. Europe is already turning on you. Shame it will be too late for the children that are killed tonight, as we speak. But you do you…
This is just silly man.
Supporting a genocidal apartheids state is sillier.
Wonder why nobody tried to just kindly ask Hitler to stop. Instead they violently shot the Nazi’s that were killing them. So uncivilized
Israel isn’t an apartheid state either. Arabs are 20% of government lol
Comparing the Jews to Nazis is a stretch of very unique proportions
You are completely right. If Israel really wanted to exterminate Palestine the whole thing would look drastically different and would have been completed years and years ago. Instead Israel left Gaza and all they received for that is constant missile attacks.
Yep, the fact those missile attacks have not resulted in massive civilian casualties, is not due to them not trying enough… People writing about “kids with rocks”, tend to forget that
Since 2001, Palestinian militants have launched tens of thousands of rocket and mortar attacks on Israel from the Gaza Strip
(From wikipedia)
I’ll tell you one thing - I’ve been on reddit just trying to provide some counters to the (extremely genocidal) conversation going on over there, but the censorship is just out of control. /r/worldnews mods will straight up permaban you for a comment like “I just wish everyone would try to resolve this peacefully”. You look at the front of /r/worldnews any day, it’s 60% articles from Israeli newspapers and the comments are just 75% “[removed]”.
One of the biggest discussion sites on the internet and they’ve basically weaponized it into a propaganda tool. Shameful time we live in.
Reddit has been extremely trash. Going back from time to time wondering if the people there are talking about topics I’m interested in that haven’t gained traction on lemmy has made me seriously question why I ever liked using that site. You’re absolutely right about the genocidal conversation on r/worldnews, it’s so disgusting.
That sub isn’t officially right-wing, but it’s definitely right-wing. I’ve seen a ton of transphobic bullshit upvoted there too, for example.
It has been the same way for many years. I remember that’s why people started world politicssub but that was taken over or something. Most of reddit has become a breeding ground for hate filled Americans and Israelis who think there is no higher calling in the world but to kill terrorists and any amount of collateral damage is acceptable. Of course every definition of terrorists also applies to Israel but they don’t see the irony of that.
If you’re using r/worldnews as the bar for impartiality then that’s your problem
Is ongoing genocide really the place for a “ha ha, the other site sucks” post?
I’m not laughing.
Why is “good progress” in quotes but not “war with Hamas?”
Characterizing the leveling of Gaza as a war with Hamas is Israeli propaganda.
‘Good progress, with this kill rate we’ll be done in a few years!’
Well this is horrifying.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
(tldr: 6 sentences skipped)
Hagari also said Israel would allow trucks carrying food, water and medicine to enter Gaza on Saturday, indicating that bombing might pause, at least in the area of its border with Egypt where small amounts of aid have been arriving.
(tldr: 8 sentences skipped)
Medecins Sans Frontieres (Doctors Without Borders) said it was particularly worried for patients, medical staff and thousands of families taking shelter there and at other health facilities.
An Al Jazeera correspondent, reporting live on Saturday morning, described the cut in internet and phone communications as “catastrophic” for rescue efforts following a night of heavy Israeli bombardment.
(tldr: 11 sentences skipped)
There has been growing speculation that a Qatari-brokered deal to release more hostages was imminent but Israeli military spokesman Hagari said Hamas was cynically manipulating the situation.
(tldr: 7 sentences skipped)
The armed wing of Hamas, the al-Qassam brigades, said early on Saturday its fighters were clashing with Israeli troops in Gaza’s northeastern town of Beit Hanoun and in the central area of Al-Bureij.
(tldr: 3 sentences skipped)
The United States and other Western countries have offered strong support to Israel but had urged it to hold off on a ground offensive for fear that high casualties among Palestinians would fuel wider conflict.
(tldr: 8 sentences skipped)
The original article contains 1,126 words, the summary contains 215 words. Saved 81%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
Obviously hitting some weapons cache from the secondaries on the clips I’ve seen.
Without knowing who I am talking about, which would you say is closer to your view: If a group fires rockets and kills civilians, is it
A) An act of terror for which the group should be punished
B) A regrettable outcome but permissible because they should have the right to defend themselves
I think anyone who knowingly fires rockets into civilian populations should be held to account for their war crimes. I am pro-peace.
I also believe any people, if backed into a tight enough corner, will retaliate by any means they deem necessary. I do not blame them for their actions but I also do not condone nor support them, and if they kill civilians should be held to account for their war crimes. I am still pro-peace.
A false dichotomy.
For the purposes of what is going on: one government attacked another government, leading to retaliation. In both cases, civillians were predominantly targeted.
Hamas are terrorists, no doubts about it. But they are also the government of Gaza. And the Israeli Government/IDF/Mossad have been engaging in a slow genocide of a people in what amounts to a concentration camp for decades.
There are no “good guys” in this war. And it is a war. And, like in all wars, it is the civilians who suffer. The Israelis and tourists who were viciously attacked and brutalized. And the Palestinians being used as human shields by Hamas.
And… that is also why a “two state solution” is off the table. Because it will just mean Hamas becomes legitimized and consolidates their power.
But… there is also no situation where the Palestinians survive under the Israeli government.
It may be a false dichotomy, but it is also two contradictory positions held by the both groups in this conflict.
