Azerbaijan has said its military measures in Nagorno-Karabakh are continuing for a second day, having launched what it calls “anti-terror” operations in the enclave.

It says it will not stop until Karabakh’s ethnic Armenians surrender.

Tensions in the South Caucasus have been high for months around the breakaway region, recognised internationally as part of Azerbaijan.

Azerbaijan and Armenia last went to war three years ago.

  • 1bluepixel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    So. I guess “operation” is what we’re calling war these days? Disappointing to see even the BBC fall in line with the newspeak.

  • TinyPizza@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    You know why we in the west suck? We never do the right thing unless in benefits us directly. We’ve known for years that this was going to happen again and did jack shit to help the Armenian people secure themselves against it. We will go to the ends of the earth to protect Israel, but Armenia? Sorry y’all, your genocide just don’t hit the same.

    For anyone who wants to know more about Karabakh and the horrible shit Azerbaijan has been pulling, I recommend checking a few of the more recent episodes on the “Popular Front” podcast. Also, send love and respect to people like James Adomian and Joe from “Lions Led By Donkeys” podcast, who repatriated to Armenia over the past few years. If there’s any justice in this world then hopefully some non-asshole power will lend Armenia the strength to defend itself.

    • Quokka@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wait so if we suck for never always doing the right thing, how bad is everyone outside the west for not even doing it some of the time?

      • TinyPizza@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I dunno, the majority don’t really go around acting like world police in the first place, so it’s not really a comparable thing? Also, it’s not like we just have a “whoopsy” and do the wrong thing every so often. It’s a big old shit layer cake all the way down with a non-awful icing on top named WWII. We can topple democratic governments so that banana prices stay low, but if there isn’t an obvious benefit or a lobbyist throwing money at it, then it doesn’t happen. No country should be acting in the way America does to begin with, but if we’re doing it anyway, we may as well at least try to demonstrate some measure of compassion and altruism in providing defensive aid.

        What we’re really talking about (or should be) is the elimination of war in modern society and that was the goal of the League of Nations and it’s successor the United Nations. That in of itself was intended as a way for countries large and small to maintain the peace and contribute troops to defensively stopping wars from happening. I’m gonna say we suck yet again though, as the US/West just couldn’t get off that sweet war juice and dismantle it’s military industrial complex. War is money to a lot of folk, so the “defense” industry can keep greasing the right palms to keep the machine moving. We do what we want, regardless of what the U.N. or I.C.C. dictate, and in not being able to be held to account, we nullify the validity and effectiveness of those institutions.

        ACAB, especially the world ones.

          • TinyPizza@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Didn’t say that it was? If we’re having a discussion on military spending, global policing, western powers military’s and their combined lack of action, then the singular country accounting for 40% of all military spending worldwide (that’s part of the west) deserves a bit more emphasis in my opinion. They’re all failures, some failures just deserve more credit.

    • Aqarius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I kinda wonder if Russia could just invade Armenia, just to get them some NATO guns to defend themselves with.

      • andyburke@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Armenia is a member of the CSTO, right? That’s the NATO alternative run by Russia, as I understand it. Russia has no ability to actually help Armenia in this conflict, though.

        I agree that the west is awful about doing the right thing if there’s no compounding factor to juice it like oil.

        But Armenia made a decision to ally themselves with Russia for protection. That has proven to be a terrible mistake. Let’s not pretend this was a completely unavoidable situation that the west could just walk into and stop. Armenia’s membership in CSTO complicates that greatly.

        So … gonna go with “a little of column a, a little of column b” here. I wish the west was more righteous and less greedy. I wish Armenia had chosen better friends.

        • TinyPizza@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          From what I know, the roots of CSTO basically go back to the early 90’s and a time where a collective guarantee of regional safety largely made sense after the fracture of the soviet states. There was a lot of hope for Russia back then, and at the time, it probably made a lot of sense 30 years ago. New Russia, not so much…

          So I see what your saying but also fully understand why a country of under 3 million and a very sparse economy would take the deal to defend against a territory hungry dictatorial petro state. How about we nudge that 50/50 to a 70/30?

          • andyburke@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I hear you, but they didn’t timewarp from the late 90s to today, either. 2014 would have been a good time to think carefully about their defensive coalition membership.

            Edit: I want to finish by saying I wish the US lived up to our ideals more often and that I also wish Armenia had better protection through their defense pacts.

        • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Let’s not pretend this was a completely unavoidable situation that the west could just walk into and stop

          It was, Armenia hasn’t ever been offered an alternative. So let’s not pretend that “the West” is clean of complicity in a genocide here.

          I wish Armenia had chosen better friends.

          It didn’t choose, don’t pretend, again. NATO has Turkey as a member, and supports that member, and that member supports Azerbaijan, and Azerbaijan is attacking Armenia.

    • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s literally what they openly mean, I’d also argue that EU, US etc representatives understand this very well, and now 4 days after your comment there’s no news from villages cut off by Azeris (naturally they’ve cut off communication too), there are also rumors of mass murders of civilians caught there with rape, dismemberment and all the traditional Azeri stuff, followed by disposal of corpses by burning them.

      Of course Azeris like to spread false rumors to demoralize Armenians, but there’s one problem - these rumors come from very different sources (some activists, some social media accounts, some pro-Russian bootlickers, some people of the opposite views) and do not contradict each other, rather intersect. There’s no evidence yet, but the evidence which went viral in previous years was apparently deliberately let out by Azeri government, judging by its timing being very advantageous for them, and also video quality. So they may simply not let out anything if they think they may be punished.

      Though at this point I don’t think they’d be punished if they’d just kill everyone in NK on camera and officially admit that.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan accused Azerbaijan of starting a ground operation aimed at “ethnic cleansing”.

    But hundreds of Armenian protesters, frustrated by their country’s response, clashed with police outside parliament in Yerevan, condemning their leader as a traitor and calling on him to resign.

    Azerbaijan said talks could start in the town of Yevlakh, some 100km (60km) north of the Karabakh regional capital of Khankendi, called Stepanakert by ethnic Armenians.

    Azerbaijan said it had launched its operation in response to the deaths of six people, including four police, in two fatal landmine explosions on Tuesday morning.

    Russia’s foreign ministry said it had been warned of the Azerbaijani offensive only minutes in advance and urged both countries to respect a ceasefire signed after the war in 2020.

    Hikmet Hajiyev, special adviser to Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev, called on the separatist ethnic-Armenian administration to “dissolve itself”.


    The original article contains 710 words, the summary contains 145 words. Saved 80%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!