• tabular@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If the goal is software freedom for everyone then proprietary software working on Linux isn’t the end goal. Maybe it’s good - a step towards the end game - but I worry it’s a peak which is difficult to get down and up to a higher peak. Proprietary software on Linux is convenience above freedom.

    • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      AutoCAD has been I distry standard for 40 years now, and it’s never going away. Can’t run it on Linux. It and Revit are 100% mandatory in construction/ arch / engineering

      • tabular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have heard of those examples before but I have no use for that so I have not learned specifics to talk about.

        Would bet it is harder to combat that “this will never change” mindset in the userbase than actually making alternatives. For 20 years from the 50’s it was normal for ALL software to be public domain. Times change, and it’s up to us users if they want better.

    • XPost3000@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, that’s what I’m getting at, proprietary software on Linux is just a step forward towards a fully FOSS future

      For the most part, there aren’t many professional fields that have a good FOSS option, so in the meantime their only option is to keep using the industry standard until a good alternative matures like Blender has

      At the very least, people would have the freedom to not use microsoft or apple while still working professionally in their respective industry, so that’s more free overall