I know that it’s popular to dismiss President Biden. I get it. He’s old. This is the first election featuring the 2 oldest candidates, ever. So what? The future of the WORLD is literally dependent on this election. To boot Biden from the ticket and try to bootstrap another candidate is madness. Booting this incumbent and hoping his VP will succeed is like firing the cook and hoping the dishwasher will give you Michelin-quality food. Stick with the old man, and figure out a way to enact his popular policies while also expanding the Supreme Court, enacting term limits and limiting “Christian” Nationalists.

  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    If everyone in this country starts betraying their values just to save it, then the nation might not be worth saving anymore.

    Don’t presume my values. I’m trans in a red state. When Trump wins I’m probably going to die.

    Dumping Biden is life or death to me, so no shit I’m going to be stubborn.

    Meanwhile, you would rather Trump get elected than Democrats replace Biden.

    Your priorities are fucked dawg 😞

    • Carrolade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      No, I actually think Biden would beat Trump if we actually had the election with him. If we look at the polling before the race to replace Santos’ seat, the dems outperformed their polling average by 8 points, and I expect something similar in the national. As I said, polls are not that great these days.

      Additionally, I hope Biden does drop out, I think Harris would be a stronger candidate and improve our chances. However, I will fight this silly idea that some backroom, democratic party behind-the-scenes conspiracy group can magically save us. It cannot. The only ones that can save us is us, the voters who have to get out the vote with grassroots effort. No matter who the dem candidate is. Biden can help by resigning, but that is outside of the control of everyone but Biden. I actually think he will, though, he’s a good man.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            So, what, does that have nothing to do with the Party slowly coming out against his candidacy? Democratic donors freaking out? The endless parade of opinion pieces? Elected representatives asking for him to step aside? The Party is putting the pressure on!

            If he drops out I think that shows Party power.

            • Carrolade@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              You have a fondness for exaggeration and absolutes it seems. It has to be party control, or nothing to do. Consider a spectrum, shades of grey. As I said, they have influence, sway, they can lobby. Pressure. This is not control, command, force. The difference involves free will.

              You understand a spectrum, yes? How, much like gender, something can be beyond a simple binary? We can have an in-between thing?

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Where were the debates? I’ll tell you! The Party decided there would be no debates, because they had already chosen Biden to be the nominee. No debates means no media coverage for those other candidates, which means their campaigns are dead on arrival. That’s something the Party controls absolutely. That’s not a spectrum.

                Voters weren’t going to choose Dean Philips or “that one author lady whose name I can’t remember” because those candidates didn’t get to speak on prime-time or get put into our news-feeds, the debates are where candidates make their case to voters.

                A real primary means having debates. So. Where were the debates? There were some private forums and townhalls held by colleges and independent media outlets, but the Democratic National Committee didn’t sponsor or host debates because they had already chosen Biden. They said “no debates on CNN or MSNBC” and that was that.

                • Carrolade@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  It would make no sense to always have debates with every small fry candidate that runs. Your opponents could pointlessly exhaust you with RFK Jr. style candidates with no real chance of winning, simply wanting to improve their own personal public profile. This is not a feasible proposal.

                  Debates are not the main introduction to a candidate, most voters don’t watch a debate. These days we just google them, get a website or wikipedia or something. Debates have minimal importance, really. Hilary “won” all her debates, by a lot. Obama “lost” his.

                  It is fully reasonable to only debate significant challengers. Not every Tom, Dick and Harry that feels like running and wants to get on tv.

                  Any more DNC conspiracy/control arguments? I am 100% capable of and willing to dismantle every last one of them, I’ve been watching politics for quite a long time. May as well give me your best.

                  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    5 months ago

                    How did a young senator from Hawaii gain the recognition needed to defeat an already well known former First Lady? Debates!

                    Stop calling normal party behavior a conspiracy, especially when they just did this out in the open! The DNC shut down the possibility of debates all the way back in 2022 and openly said they’re behind Biden. There was never a chance for anyone else to gain the recognition needed for voters to gain interest.

                    Biden told the Party that he was going to run for re-election and so they kept the field clear for him, because they believed his incumbency advantage in the general was something they needed to protect. That’s not a conspiracy, that’s normally good strategy! Except Biden rapidly declined from 2022 and that decision is going to bite us in the ass.