• FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    5 months ago

    Ah, some interesting technology news. Let’s read about what new developments are being made-

    Oh, wait, Elon Musk is involved. I hate technology! Emerald mines and cave rescue submarines!

    • bane_killgrind@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s more like “idiot billionaire builds bigger shiny gadget for a non specific purpose”

      Like what’s the problem being solved here?

        • bane_killgrind@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          🙄 this is interesting? Is there no new application or topology here?

          If it’s just “more power vroom” this is only valuable for entertainment.

    • slurpyslop@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      yeah because if musk wasn’t involved, lemmy’s community always loves news on the latest ai hype cycle

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        5 months ago

        Ah yes, the wrong kind of technology.

        If it’s a “hype cycle” I guess it’ll be going away aaaaaany day now.

        • slurpyslop@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          Ah yes, the wrong kind of technology.

          what point do you think you’re making here?

          it’s /c/technology, not “/c/unquestionedpraisefortechnology”

          If it’s a “hype cycle” I guess it’ll be going away aaaaaany day now.

          my guy even people within the ai r&d sphere acknowledge that it’s a hype cycle

          • Stardust@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            I think maybe you meant to link to AI Winter (which that link has a link to down at the bottom) as that article doesn’t really support your point (that people within AI acknowledge it has hype cycles) at all, there’s nothing about AI directly in it, although it does serve a refutation that ‘hype cycle’ means it’ll go away; if that’s what you meant your sentence was a bit odd.

            • slurpyslop@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              the citation is because the only way you could claim ai isn’t in a hype cycle at the moment is if you don’t know that that’s a defined term within tech spaces