• atrielienz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Because you both made assumptions. Just because your assumptions were not about the article itself doesn’t mean that you didn’t make assumptions.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      The assumption you claimed I made was in relation to a fact I stated that’s in the article. Wtf are you on about, specifically?

      • atrielienz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        No. The assumption was that the other person had the context you had from the article, and chose to call someone stupid. But I don’t know why you’re even bothering with this. You obviously don’t agree and that’s fine.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          You’re attempting to change what you accused me of assuming. But in your attempt to be not wrong, you made yourself even more wrong.

          I made no assumption that they read the article. I was actually pretty sure they didn’t, in typical Lemmy fashion.

          So it’s not actually you assuming. Lol

          And why do you keep on acting like I’m the only one keeping this conversation going? You’ve responded to me as much as I’ve responded to you.