• PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    The answer has been given over and over again but it doesn’t meet the pro-gun communities deliberately impossible standards. Why bother answering it yet again?

    • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Frankly the answer is “make the cops do their fucking jobs” not “make a list of gun purchasers public.Public means that you or I could access the list, what the hell do you plan to do with this list? Tell the FBI “hey that list you maintain has a new entry, as you know, because you’re the ones keeping the list?” Do you have jurisdiction anywhere on the entire planet? The literal only reason to make it public is to have a handy list of what houses it’s safe to break into when occupied vs when unoccupied. It’s basically a treasure map to arm criminals.

      • PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        What made you think I cared? I’ve never advocated making gun owners public knowledge, I’m just laughing because gun owners insist their guns can keep them safe from criminals but shrivel up at the idea of those criminals knowing where they live and targeting them specifically.

        As always with the pro-gun community, consequences are other people.

        • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Ya mama said you did.

          Are you really dumb enough that you can’t see how regardless of a gun owner’s ability to defend themselves while they are home, they also don’t want people targeting their house for theft while they aren’t home based on a “has gun” list? Do you want stolen guns to end up in the hands of criminals? You think they have some magical ability to shoot people while they aren’t at the location of the theft or something? This isn’t fallout with grenade bouquets lmao.

          As always with the pro-gun community, consequences are other people.

          The consequences are the people’s who commit the crime, not the gun owning populace as a whole who has not? Yes.

          • PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            You really need to get your feelings out about this don’t you? The world must no your opinion, even the people who aren’t actually advocating it.

            Anyway, your feelings are bullshit. The pro-gun community routinely opposes safe storage laws and are happy to leave guns in glove compartments and closets. Not that the black market is required to arm criminals, given how easy it is to pass a background check, straw purchase or buy privately but again, the pro-gun community opposes reforms to combat all of that.

            So whatever the fuck “The consequences are the people’s who commit the crime, not the gun owning populace as a whole who has not? Yes” is supposed to mean, it’s clear that you’re only upset that you would be in danger, since you put other people in danger all the time.

            • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Safe storage penalizes victims for being stolen from and is a tax to stop those dirty poors from having guns, glove compartments are necessary sometimes to follow the laws regarding where you can and can’t carry which is the fault of the business and government that is forcing it, not the one forced to.

              Not that the black market is required to arm criminals

              Well it is if they’ve been charged with something.

              given how easy it is to pass a background check,

              Oh so “no criminal record,” shocker.

              straw purchase

              Illegal.

              or buy privately

              Illegal if you’re a prohibited possessor.

              And even with all that, publishing a list is still stupid. I put nobody in danger, you’re projecting, it’s your stupid ideas on guns that endanger people, and not even gun owners but the people who will be harmed with their stolen guns. You don’t give a shit though because if they die it “owns the republitards” so it’s actually a win for you, I know.

              • PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Safe storage penalizes victims for being stolen from

                Good. If you didn’t take reasonable steps to secure your firearms, your negligence armed criminals. Guns are already an exception to “dangerous things must be properly secured” thanks to crybaby gun owners.

                Oh and don’t waste your breath with a “B-B-B-But LockPickingLawyer opened this gun safe with his flaccid cock” because that’s not even close to an insurmountable problem.

                a tax to stop those dirty poors from having guns

                You’re using poor people as a human shield. You’ve never advocated giving people guns as a form of welfare and realistically a gun is one of the last things those “dirty poors” need.

                You’re a simp for a multi-billion industry that funds the very worst Republicans and puts profits before lives. You don’t have a leg to stand on.

                glove compartments are necessary

                Sounds like we know where you leave your gun. It’s grossly negligent and absolutely your fault. Either leave your gun at home (where I’m guessing it’s just as poorly secured) or don’t go to places that don’t want you.

                Well it is if they’ve been charged with something. Oh so “no criminal record,” shocker Illegal

                Laws that are a complete failure, which the pro-gun community opposes all changes to, including better enforcement.

                Illegal if you’re a prohibited possessor

                Consequences for other people. The “responsible gun owner” making the private sale gets away with selling a gun to a dangerous person. If we only charged underage people for buying alcohol (and not the person who supplied them), there would be zero expectation of those laws working.

                And even with all that, publishing a list is still stupid

                Yet again, not actually a thing I advocated, just something I mocked your reaction to. Let’s hope for your families sake you’re not so easily confused when you hear a bump in the night.

                I put nobody in danger

                Another worthless promise from a gun owner. Whatever minimal vetting you’ve been through is demonstrably not enough to ensure gun owners aren’t a danger. You cleared the same low bar as the people shooting at children who rang their doorbell or used their driveway to turn around.

                If we reduce you to a statistic, it’s even more bullshitty. Every person in your household is at a greater risk of domestic homicide and suicide.

                it’s your stupid ideas on guns

                Are you still throwing a tantrum about an idea I didn’t suggest or supoort, or are you just assuming all of my opinions based on what the gun lobby have told you I believe?

                Your laws have failed America. It’s 20 years past when “responsible gun owners” should have actually taken some responsibility.

                • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  Way to victim blame, if criminals didn’t steal them they wouldn’t be stolen, your logic is rapist logic, “she was asking for it out late at night in that slutty skirt, should’ve locked it up in a chastity belt.”

                  I actually do advocate for a government program to pass out firearms to individuals in need, like a broke single mother with an abusive ex, for instance. Thing is I’m not the government so what I advocate for doesn’t necessarily become policy. Funny how that works. Furthermore just because something that requires another’s time, labor, and materials is sold by the company that makes it doesn’t mean we should arbitrarily raise it more to make it harder for the poor (of which I am one, btw, “you don’t care about the poor like yourself” is a dumb fucking take.)

                  Actually I view those laws as unsafe, therefore I just illegally carry past the sign. It’s safer where someone would have to grab my dick to get it than unattended in a car. I’m not supposed to do that though, I’m supposed to leave it in the car. Oopsies. Still if someone does follow the law, the theft is the fault of the thief and the one who made it available for the thief: the law.

                  “Including” meaning “only” better enforcement, yes. Finish the laws you have at home before buying new ones little Timmy.

                  EHHH INCORRECT! If you sell a gun to a person who you should reasonably know is a prohibited possessor, like underage people, you get what is called “prison time.” People have also been begging for years for access to NICs to help with this but you don’t want to give it to us.

                  You’re in a thread about advocating for a public list “mocking” gun owners who think a public list is a bad idea. Sure sounds like you’re advocating for it while trying to pretend you aren’t like a slimy little weasel.

                  If we reduce you to a statistic,

                  Hmm ok let’s see, there are 600,000,000 guns in the US, and yearly about 60,000 are used in murders/accidents/suicide, that is a 0.01% chance that in any given year my gun will be involved in a death. “OH NOOOOOOOO.” Btw it’s actually less because this equation assumes each gun only kills one person, but as we know that isn’t the case in every scenario.

                  We’ve talked before dingus I know you have stupid opinions on guns first hand because you incessantly repeat them lmao.

                  • PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    5 months ago

                    Way to victim blame

                    “This woman scratched and bit me while I was raping her, so I’m the real victim”

                    I remember you now. You’re not worth my time and it doesn’t look like there’s anyone left in the thread who is. I didn’t read most of your comment but laughed when I saw you’ve lifted my insults to use as your own. Looks like you have made space for me in your head.