• gregorum@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    That’s mostly for inspiration. English Common Law, the Magna Carta, etc., have no legal bearing in US courts.

    Japanese courts have a millennium of history of legal precedent and jurisprudence to consider in their decision, and nothing from the west has anything to do with it.

    • WillySpreadum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Justice Alito cited the 13th century English legal treatise De Legibus et Consuetudinibus Angliae when he allowed states to ban abortion so I guess it’s pretty inspiring.

      Source

      • gregorum@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        He was inspired by the fact he couldn’t cite any actual United States legal precedent.

        • WillySpreadum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Lol so true. Doesn’t change the fact that it’s an almost 800 year old citation being used by the majority opinion of the highest court in the land.

          Talk about precedent.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Eh the Japanese pretty much imported the BGB wholesale, a metric fuckton of countries have civil and criminal codes that root in either the French or German traditions. Their system is also generally firmly rooted in civil law, that is, precedent is non-binding.

      This is mostly a case of politicians not wanting to stir controversy, I think: While most Japanese would be in favour it’s a change and on top of that a change that would really piss off a minority so in the interest of conflict averseness the can is getting kicked down the road.