• Natanael@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    They spent years lying about their encryption algorithms too acting like they’re more secure than Signal when they never were

      • atrielienz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Supposedly to combat spam (which makes sense) and some BS about bringing your social network.

        But let’s think about this logically. What can they do with your phone number when they don’t know who you are?

        Let’s say they receive a subpoena from a government law enforcement entity. That would have to include your phone number and even then what can they give that entity? The date you registered the number and the last time your account was active?

        At best my guess is that you and others who bring this up are worried about the information that you can buy from data brokers that would include a phone number and allow someone with the phone number to link it to a person.

        But at that point law enforcement already knows the number, already has likely used to same services to link that number to a human, and since most people haven’t de-googled or use an iPhone they likely know what apps are installed. Including signal.

        What is the threat profile that should be worried about this?

        Please note that I don’t think they should need to require a phone number and if you don’t want that you can use a different service.

        But I’d like someone to elaborate on their reasons for objecting to this.

        • FudgyMcTubbs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I would assume if an entity had my phone number they could easily connect it to me, like by spoofing it and calling themselves and getting the name off caller id or some shit, or even just subpoenaing the phone carrier for the id of the phone number. Why they would want to do that for little old fudgy mctubbs is beyond me.

          I’ll say it: I dont want anybody to know what I jack off to. It’s all legal stuff, but im too prudish to have that be public.

          Anonymity is impossible, but we can still attempt it.

          • atrielienz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            They don’t offer anonymity. Anonymity does not equal privacy. They aren’t the same thing. And if you’re using the signal app to jerk off I have some questions.

            • FudgyMcTubbs@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              I dont use super secret messaging apps. I also dont fuck with peer to peer anything. I was broadly speaking about why anonymity on the internet is important to me.

        • chameleon@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          I ended up wanting an online pseudonymous identity as well as an offline real-life identity, which leads to needing multiple phone numbers when things are tied to said number. That’s extremely annoying to manage, especially with Signal’s current activity and update policies that essentially require you to keep a phone in a drawer, charge it and log into it every so often or risk losing your entire account due to inactivity, as only the mobile device counts for that purpose (this might supposedly be changing).

          In that particular scenario, I don’t really care if my least-favorite three-letter-agency or law enforcement can link my identities. It’s a nice bonus if they can’t, but not an absolutely required feature. The main worry is the person on the other end trivially learning it. But the person on the other end might have a different set of worries that makes Signal one of the few available options for them.

          That said, Telegram also requires a phone number and has exactly the same issue, so this is a rather weird thread to bring that up.

          • atrielienz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Thank you for taking my questions seriously and giving your perspective.

            I suppose to some extent I do this with emails. I have an email for public and professional things and one for just hobbies and thing I enjoy.

            I think the main difference for me is I’m not trying to keep those two “identities” anonymous from each other or anything. It’s just good compartmentalization (to keep work stuff work stuff, professional stuff professional, and hobby stuff hobby stuff.