• village604@adultswim.fan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          What bullshit, making sure kids use school property only for school?

          Or did you mistakenly think I was suggesting that accessing the webcam was a part of usage monitoring software?

          • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Then keep it fucking at school.

            It shouldn’t be in homes. Its a constitutional violation. Schools are state sponsored and tax funded.

            They shouldn’t be legally allowed to record shit in a private home with out a warrant.

          • MML@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            The school elected to enable TheftTrack to allow school district employees to secretly and remotely activate the standard webcam featured in all Apple laptops since 2006.[17][25][26][27] That allowed school officials to secretly take photographs through the webcam, of whatever was in front of it and in its line of sight, and send the photographs to the school’s server.[9][17] The system took and sent a new photograph every 15 minutes when the laptop was on, and TheftTrack was activated, though school employees could adjust the timeframe to as low as one-minute intervals.[9][28][29] LANrev disabled the webcams for all other uses (e.g., students were unable to use Photo Booth or video chat), so most students mistakenly believed that their webcams did not work at all.[30]

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robbins_v._Lower_Merion_School_District

              • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                It doesn’t need an answer because it was rhetorical. The devices do that because they are owned by Google, and the license they did not read or care about granted Google permission to do that and was foisted upon every family in the district without their consent or any means to opt out or alternatives.