The reason the FCC is only allowing the sale of state approved routers in the US?

  • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Hmm. The article appears to conflate multiple things?

    One of them is “viewing” the RF spectrum to build up an image. The other is reading the unencrypted beamforming data from a router. That second one depends on people carrying a WiFi-capable piece of electronics with them doesn’t it? There has to be something for the beam to focus on, some sort of beacon signal.

    Although I guess all it really needs is for the person to step between the router and a device connected to the router; that should enable analysis of the disruption patterns.

    • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t think a person has to carry anything. The tracking is based on measuring the interference a moving person (or a dog) creates between the router and a connected device like a range extender or a networked printer.