slazer2au@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-22 天前If XCOM didn't exist before AI slop, people would assume missing 3 90% shots in a row was due to AI generated code not just how probability works.message-squaremessage-square52linkfedilinkarrow-up1283arrow-down127
arrow-up1256arrow-down1message-squareIf XCOM didn't exist before AI slop, people would assume missing 3 90% shots in a row was due to AI generated code not just how probability works.slazer2au@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-22 天前message-square52linkfedilink
minus-squareWildmimic@anarchist.nexuslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·2 天前it’s a 1 in 1000 event, that really hurts (or doesn’t in this case)
minus-squaremorto@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25·2 天前We lose the notion of how many shots we fire in the game, so very unlikely events like that are very likely to happen at least once in a playthrough, but they still feel absurd. Our minds simply aren’t made for statistics
minus-squareslazer2au@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·2 天前I can’t remember where I heard it but I remember someone saying for every 90% shot you miss, how many 10% did you hit and not call unfair.
minus-squareryathal@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up17·2 天前None, I’d never attempt a 10% shot. 50-60 is the most desperate I’ve gotten. Anything less and you might as well overwatch.
it’s a 1 in 1000 event, that really hurts (or doesn’t in this case)
We lose the notion of how many shots we fire in the game, so very unlikely events like that are very likely to happen at least once in a playthrough, but they still feel absurd. Our minds simply aren’t made for statistics
I can’t remember where I heard it but I remember someone saying for every 90% shot you miss, how many 10% did you hit and not call unfair.
None, I’d never attempt a 10% shot. 50-60 is the most desperate I’ve gotten. Anything less and you might as well overwatch.