sanitation@lemmy.radio to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoSpaceX not the behemoth everyone thoughtwww.axios.comexternal-linkmessage-square33linkfedilinkarrow-up1137arrow-down13cross-posted to: usa@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1134arrow-down1external-linkSpaceX not the behemoth everyone thoughtwww.axios.comsanitation@lemmy.radio to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square33linkfedilinkcross-posted to: usa@lemmy.ml
minus-squareSaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up36·1 day ago“For context, 200 companies in the S&P 500 had more revenue last year than did SpaceX. This includes Tesla, whose sales were five times higher.” But Tesla is “selling” cybertrucks to SpaceX.
minus-squareJackcooper@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·14 hours agoRevenue is so useless without context of profit. Now companies are advertising revenue swapping. So. Dumb.
minus-squareiturnedintoanewt@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·15 hours agoThe fact that they didn’t even mention this in the article seems very lazy reporting.
“For context, 200 companies in the S&P 500 had more revenue last year than did SpaceX. This includes Tesla, whose sales were five times higher.”
But Tesla is “selling” cybertrucks to SpaceX.
Revenue is so useless without context of profit. Now companies are advertising revenue swapping. So. Dumb.
The fact that they didn’t even mention this in the article seems very lazy reporting.