• sparkyshocks@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 小时前

      But that’s true no matter where you put the data center. If you have to dump the waste heat somewhere, the high density and specific heat of water is a better heatsink than the air around us.

    • jmill@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      14 小时前

      That’s true, but water is so much more effective at absorbing heat than air, the effect will be negligible. It takes about 4.2 megajoules to raise one cubic meter of water 1 degree C. That energy would raise over 3 cubic KILOMETERS of air 1 degree C.

      Even putting data centers at the bottom of large lakes would be unlikely to have an effect. It will not be percetable in the ocean. Regarding temperature anyway, other factors are worth considering.

      • Benaaasaaas@group.lt
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 小时前

        This is slightly off topic but when our local NPP was operational the lake that they used as heatsink would never freeze over even in the coldest winters. Of course it’s not a huge lake.