What am I doing wrong, the URL never responds to me?

Some of them are great. Lidl comes to mind.

Dozens of 'em.

Graphics

My read on this is, that they realize that the full AGI is not coming and they need to focus on computational efficiency to be profitable. We will probably see a lot of work from them focusing on increasing switching costs as the models themselves become commoditized.

Their problem is, that their frontier models get distilled quickly by DeepSeek and co. The distilled models will then go on to provide 90% of the efficiency for 10% of the compute.

They are used, not exclusively except by Tesla, but yeah. Lane keep is legit hard to do without a camera, acc is OK but using a multi sensor system is a lot more reliable.

Well, the cars all have modems and quite a lot of processing. They don’t need to send a lot of data anywhere to check if it has seen familiar faces.

Modern cars are literally cameras with wheels.

I will admit that changing the settings on the safety tech changes nothing in this regard.

So you are sure that no one can access the cameras used for that?

They can also deduplicate files, so one file which is shared by multiple people (or even multiple people uploading the same file independently) only needs storing once.

Especially if you’'ve got a septic system.

Fines are usually paid to a government whose citizens have suffered. The government can then use the money for the benefit of citizens… Given of course that the government is generally inclined to such a thing.

Ah, corporations are people when donating for political causes and when ecxercising free speech, but not when driving a vehicle?

We have this in Finland, some rich people have been fined over 200k for speeding. No particular targeting of rich people noted.

They couldn’t before?

You also need to have a Finnish style progressive fines relative to income, which would also extend to companies.

Perhaps they didn’t wear them, the user thought the glasses were off and not recording.

On some level I agree with the sentiment that China’s military power aspirations seem to be primarily regional with soft power as we zoom out I would argue for “Don’t listen what leaders say, watch what they do”.

You don’t build giant landing craft unless you consider a marine landing warfare scenario as credible. You don’t build aircraft carriers unless you care about power projection. You don’t need ballistic missiles unless your enemies are far away. All of these things cost money you could otherwise spend on keeping your citizens happy.

There are a lot of verifiable and expensive signals about China’s power posture transitioning towards a more expeditionary one. Now, they might end up carrying the big stick and speaking softly, which is better for everyone – even if the PRC ends up getting their way – but that just means the hard power lever was used in a different way.

Of course they are, in capitalism, capital likes capital.

Or fools.

Rutte is an artist at that, but to be fair that is his job. “The Germans down and Americans in” I believe was the expression.

Android emulator on your computer?