This isn’t the place to ask if you want a real answer.

The silly take is that using it is “part of the problem”.

Also, the glue on pizza thing is nearly a moot point. The models are much more advanced now and will continue to be.

The commercial LLM’s can share their sources now so that’s also a moot point.

It’s not going away. Learn to use it effectively.

At this point I’m ready to consider an ICE military coup

Damn they’re behind. I was using emuflight for a bit and iNAV. Wonder why they aren’t using iNAV. Great for long distance. You also need a barometer for altitude.

Maybe USB A?

This is such a silly take.

Man the whole world is cycling towards conservative views right now. Nationalism is so hot right now.

I’m just gonna wear a mask and tactical gear from now on. Call everybody “brother” and drink American beer. Wait out the next 3.5 years.

I wonder what configurator they’re using because I’m pretty sure most have a hold mode now. And if not, why not use one that does? It won’t hold like a DJI drone, but def works.

I’d say I was a decent pilot when I was flying a lot but my skill level after a month vs a year of flying was vastly different, and I could still be a lot better.

Also as an fpv pilot, the line, “lack of qualified pilots / hard to fly” makes me want to give it a shot.

That’s not how it works though. It would be great if these AI models were deterministic but you can get different answers to the same questions at any given time. Given different input and given different goals, the agents wouldn’t likely fail on the same task when given proper instruction.

The main point is that it’s not going to be correct all the time. And neither is a human.

The regulation comes in when you’re dealing with sensitive information, like health diagnoses. There needs to be some logic in place to stop the models from being so confident with wrong answers that could hurt people.

Realistically, neither of us know what’s gonna work until we try it. Theoretically, verification agents would work.

Sure but they’re doing opposite tasks. You’re absolutely right that they could be wrong sometimes. So are people. Over time it gets better, especially with more regulation and smarter models.

The user. You could have the output include the “conversation” between the agents and validate the decisions. Not perfect, but better. People aren’t perfect either.

The checker models aren’t trying to give you a correct answer with confidence. Their purpose is to find an incorrect answer. They’ll both do their task with confidence.

There should be a series of AI agents in place when a GPT is used. The agents intake the query and review the output before sending it off to the user.

Unfortunately this type of logical fallacy is used across the political spectrum. It’s an easy defense that makes people feel justified without having to do any critical thinking.

You don’t like something about my beliefs? You’re a bigot.

When is soon? This song is from 2008.

Humans have failed time and time again. Can’t wait til robots rule the world.

Still here. Turns out I’m not the only one who disagrees with you. Welcome to the internet.

Removed by mod