• 0 Posts
  • 453 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 30th, 2023

help-circle
  • Discord is going to be the age-verification-service for gaming, if they can get laws to follow fast enough.
    They have the gaming community, they have chats/friends/DMs/VoIP.
    If they release a dev toolkit that implements in-game chat, in-game VoIP, friends list and age verification… All while not being tied to steam? Imagine if they offered a system for in-game purchases and gifting purchases to friends (oh yeh https://gam3s.gg/news/discord-adds-in-app-purchases-for-in-game-items/ )
    They are positioning themselves to offer a huge range of features, easy navigation of legal minefields, and no distribution-platform tie-in - while also offering out-of-game functionality of all of that (likely leading to player retention for games that leverage it properly).

    They are positioning themselves to be a market-leader/industry-standard for game social networks. Everyone that has ever used discord is the product they are selling, and they are now releasing the features and tools for companies to leverage that.





  • Scott Manley has a video on this:
    https://youtu.be/DCto6UkBJoI

    My takeaway is that it isn’t unfeasible. We already have satellites that do a couple kilowatts, so a cluster of them might make sense. In isolation, it makes sense.
    But there is launch cost, and the fact that de-orbiting/de-commissioning is a write-off, and the fact that preferred orbits (lots of sun) will very quickly become unavailable.
    So there is kinda a graph where you get the preferred orbit, your efficiency is good enough, your launch costs are low enough.
    But it’s junk.
    It’s literally investing in junk.
    There is no way this is a legitimate investment.

    It has a finite life, regardless of how you stretch your tech. At some point, it can’t stay in orbit.
    It’s AI. There is no way humans are in a position to lock in 4 years of hardware.
    It’s satellites. There are so many factors outside of our control that (beyond launch orbit success), that there is a massive failure rate.
    It’s rockets. They are controlled explosives with 1 shot to get it right. Again, massive failure rate.

    It just doesn’t make sense.
    It’s feasible. I’m sure humanity would learn a lot. AI is not a good use of kilowatts of power in space. AI is not a good use of the finite resource of earth to launch satellites (never mind a million?!). AI is not a good reason to pullute the “good” bits of LEO














  • I doubt it.
    Tripping over a cable is as likely to damage the socket as it is to rip the cable out of the plug.
    Any appliance that increases risk by being unplugged should probably not be using a consumer connection…

    I think the 3 pin layout caused a lot of headaches, and the integrated fuse required a user-servicable plug.
    So it would have to be a split-shell design of some type, where the appliance cable would have to be cable-gripped to the same part as the plug/socket pins.
    Thus, a bottom-entry (heh) cable grip and a removable back plate that can only be unscrewed when it’s unplugged.
    This was all in a time of bakelite. Plastic wasn’t flexible.

    But no, I think tripping over an early bakelite g-type (I think it’s officially a g-type) plug cable would likely shatter the plug and pull the pins out of the socket… If it didn’t also damage the socket.