

It would probably only verify that there aren’t really trustworthy governments in the world
It would probably only verify that there aren’t really trustworthy governments in the world
Yeah who knows. As of now things look like a PR stunt
Removed by mod
Maybe, although Trump’s initiation of the ban in 2020 and its culmination under a bipartisan effort makes it seem that this is not a party issue but a function of state power responding to perceived threats to its hegemony, maybe economic, cultural, or political. This underscores the Marxist understanding that capital ultimately unites in opposition to the interests of the working class.
Communist theory is grounded in the material reality of class struggle, not in abstract “LLM slop”. The facts remain and is important to repeat: capitalism exploits workers everywhere. Let’s focus on the real issues, not dismissive labels.
Or was it an out of place reference to a meme thread in my profile history where one joke was to ask chatgpt if one doesn’t catch a joke
The dismissal is a classic deflection, avoiding the material reality of global capitalist contradictions. The working class faces the same forces of exploitation, and any attempt to obscure that fact only serves to reinforce bourgeois ideologies. It’s crucial to avoid inadvertently reinforcing us-them language; you are a part of us, as I am. The truth remains: capitalism’s structure perpetuates oppression everywhere, and the task is to unite workers globally in solidarity, not retreat into nationalist illusions.
Our dire situation is indeed global, and the crises of capitalism spare no nation, including China. While the Chinese state presents the veneer of rising material conditions, this trajectory is underpinned by the same contradictions inherent to capitalism everywhere: exploitation of labor, environmental degradation, and the alienation of workers. The notion that Chinese workers, amid rising inequality and workplace pressures, are immune to propaganda or the diversionary tactics of consumerism is illusory. What RedNote—or any platform of genuine cultural exchange—offers is the potential for workers to transcend these national divisions, expose the ideological frameworks that bind them, and unite against their common enemy: capital. To stifle the struggle of Chinese workers by reducing their experiences to caricatures or dismissing their agency as propaganda-induced is not only an act of sinophobia but a failure to recognize the universality of their plight. Whether in the imperial supepowers or somewhere in the periphery, the struggle is the same, and solidarity forged in shared understanding is the path forward. To reject this is to retreat into illusions of exceptionalism that only serve the ruling class.
Removed by mod
Everyone else is an agent in this honeypot
Saying there’s a virus in his mind about everything being woke
Yes, and while the Democratic Party under Biden has continued to erode the legitimacy of international law, this does not absolve the MAGA movement of its reactionary role in dismantling accountability mechanisms such as the ICC. From a communist perspective, both parties serve the interests of the bourgeoisie, prioritizing the preservation of U.S. imperialism over global justice.
Yes, Russia and China have distinct geopolitical ambitions, but they share a material interest with the U.S. ruling class in rejecting supranational institutions that challenge state sovereignty or expose crimes against humanity. The Trump administration’s sanctions against the ICC represent a counter-revolutionary act aligned with the broader global bourgeois strategy to suppress mechanisms that empower the proletariat through international solidarity.
And while the Democrats have contributed to this erosion, the actions of the MAGA movement reveal a more overt alignment with authoritarian tactics. MAGA, along with Russia and China, participates in a dialectical process that consolidates power in reactionary blocs, protecting bourgeois domination and suppressing proletarian struggle. Recognizing this unity of interests across seemingly opposed regimes is essential for the international working class to advance revolutionary praxis and dismantle the oppressive systems that thrive on the destruction of international law.
The reported plans of Donald Trump to impose sanctions on the International Criminal Court (ICC) fit within a broader reactionary agenda aligning with the goals of authoritarian regimes like Russia and China. This move, which aims to delegitimize international accountability mechanisms, highlights the shared priorities of MAGA and authoritarian states: undermining global institutions that challenge their power.
By targeting the ICC—an institution designed to hold individuals and states accountable for crimes against humanity—Trump’s actions echo Russia’s and China’s longstanding rejection of international judicial oversight. Russia withdrew its signature from the Rome Statute in 2016, while China has refused to ratify the treaty. These regimes, along with MAGA-aligned U.S. leadership, oppose any supranational authority that could limit their sovereignty or expose their abuses.
This attack on the ICC serves multiple reactionary purposes:
Reinforcing Nationalism: Trump’s move isolates the U.S. further from global accountability, mirroring the nationalist rhetoric used to suppress class solidarity and justify state power.
Protecting Bourgeois Interests: The ICC’s focus on human rights violations threatens the ruling classes in authoritarian and reactionary states. MAGA, Russia, and China share an interest in shielding the bourgeoisie from legal consequences.
Weakening International Solidarity: By delegitimizing institutions like the ICC, MAGA contributes to the erosion of global frameworks that could unite workers against exploitation and oppression.
This development underscores the convergence of MAGA and authoritarian regimes into what we term M(ARC)GA—a reactionary alliance that prioritizes authoritarian control and the preservation of capitalist hegemony over international justice. The global proletariat must recognize and resist this bloc’s efforts to dismantle institutions that promote accountability and cooperation. Only through solidarity and revolutionary action can we counter these reactionary strategies and advance the fight for a just and equitable world.
Definitely an example of an over the top word removal, while I get it could be purposeful with some words
I only see removed but this comment makes me think of female dogs
In general communities it’s ok here but in global events it’s easy to see in the modlog that certain topics which are not favorable for Socialist-In-Name-Only are hidden very fast.
Checks out
Vaporizing and edibles are more good than bad. Pretty much harmless in moderation. Just have your life in order first and use it to add that extra spice of awareness, instead of relying on it.
Yup, many auth/fash/totalitarian/oligarchies/etc hold elections which don’t matter
Sure, we can allow more trust to I dunno, Nauru, to a certain degree and many not