That’s exactly what they want, a massive strike that they can blame for all the economic problems caused by bad management. Trump wants to pretend that he’s running the country like a business, but he has the goldenest of parachutes. So he will crash the country into a depression and say “see? this is why unions are a problem.”
Or, he has some inside information that the Intel CEO is going to resign and wants to pretend he has that kind of power.
Because they think they’re special. They think that AI can reduce the number of programmers, the number of support staff, the number of sales agents, because AI allows fewer people to do more.
But there’s only one CEO. One COO. One CIO. They cannot conceive of a company that operates without them, so they feel no threat at all. If they are replaced, they take their golden parachute and hop back on the executive carousel for another spin.
I had a disagreement once about whether or not “between the cheeks” counts as “inside.” The final verdict was it depends on the context.
Did anyone else have a teacher that would tell everyone not to power off their computers and then flip off the breaker to the computer lab? Speaking of bad power supplies…
Probably confirms my preconceived expectations.
At least, that’s what we assume the report says.
Or some edgy marketing move, just having it redirect to an artists’ makerspace collective or something. $185 is nothing compared to the notoriety a few viral news articles would bring in.
I’m surprised it’s not already owned.
That was actually the explicit plan, per Thomas Jefferson.
So much of our government worked on the idea that nobody would be brazen enough to break convention, and the untested belief that voters would immediately and vehemently reject anyone trying to openly abuse their power.
We now know both of those assumptions were wrong.
If software is a service, then service can be denied at any time. Host your own infrastructure, and reclaim digital ownership.
That goes for large businesses and individuals.
Yep, IIRC someone committed suicide because, in part, he would never see real life floating jungle islands.
If she’s out, and not suicided immediately, she’s probably got some ridiculous amount of cash stashed away to ride out the end of the world on a tropical beach somewhere.
I can’t excuse ratfucking. The name of the game is literally democracy.
There’s no predicting who can win what election anymore. There’s no predictive value in knowing someone won such and such demographics on whatever type of ballot. I don’t want Pete to run because I think he’s paper thin on almost any meaningful issue. He’ll say whatever he thinks will get him the most votes in the moment, and he’ll abandon those principles the minute the winds change. He would be better than Trump, because he isn’t a felonious child raping grifter, but that’s not a reason to support the guy. That’s a reason to find someone who is actually a leader, who will stand on their convictions, and fight for actual justice.
Sexual predators never feel remorse. Their crimes are heinous, and it’s not possible to do something like that to another person if you have a conscience.
Between Pete, Warren, Gabbard, and Klobuchar, it’s clear that the DNC would absolutely never allow Bernie to become the nominee. They had half a dozen others lined up, like Booker, Ryan, Delaney, and of course Harris, but none of them were charismatic enough to actually win some votes. Vote Centrist, No Matter Who.
Who the fuck said we should remove due process? You understand that when a sexual assault is reported that over 90% are not investigated. “Believe women” is an instruction for the police to begin due process for victims, it’s not like jury instructions. Due process is denied to the victims because police don’t believe women.
Swear to fucking Christ, you’re like those people who act like the BLM movement is saying other lives don’t matter.
SHE’S GETTING A FUCKING PARDON!!!
Fuck no, that’s not at all what I’m suggesting. Unions need to fight, and strikes are usually the best form of leverage the worker has. Strike, certainly, but remember that your opponent is not the President or this administration. Trump wants this because he thinks it will help him. But if we are prepared for the spin, and reject the lies, then it will not help him. If he receives his fair share of the blame, it will be an albatross around his neck.