Nice try, skynet…

Matching supply with demand, as it should be, rather than screwing both buyer and seller…

A poorly regulated pid loop…

If it’s hosted in a public repo, anyone can clone it, that’s very much part of most git flows.

What you can do with the software, how you can use it, that’s another matter, based on the licence.

That of course assumes China will respect the copyright…

And AI, screenshots

So changing the name to corp.ai wasn’t clever?

Definitely getting to that point, past the peak, but I think we’re a little bit further to the left still.

Just need better moderation

I’m keen to join another tech focused community, with less non-tech spam, any recommendations?

I think that’s unfair on third world countries

Yep, and everyone understands a QR code these days

Open source also includes viral licenses like the GPL. Without copyright, the GPL is not enforceable.

There’s no open source without copyright, only public domain

First they came for the influencers, and I did not speak out, because I’m not an influencer…

This is how it should be for any agency or organisation, public or private.

The model of everyone using Twitter/Facebook is practically the same as if everyone used gmail.com as their mail domain.

Why is this in technology?

Alternative headline: Better run companies outperform

I’d be really excited for a vacuum ship

Someone was able to trademark the word “Apple”, so that’s not so surprising

how does an exchange determine how much money in usd and different cryptocurrencies to keep on hand to safely cover all depositors with them when there is such dramatic volatility in all the different cryptocurrency values?

If you move 1 BTC to an exchange, and you keep it in your account on the exchange, the exchange is meant to keep the 1 BTC on behalf of you.

They are not meant to do anything other than keep it.

An exchange is not a bank.

If the exchange takes your tokens (or fiat) and does anything other than what you ask them to do, they’re not legit.