Thanks Microsoft for admitting that Wimdows sucks. You didn’t even try really.
just trying lemmy
- 5 Posts
- 28 Comments
teri@discuss.tchncs.deto
politics @lemmy.world•Republicans calls for probe of Trump officials' Signal chat grow
72·11 months agoDoes anybody care about people in Yemen? Such a fuzz about a stupid group chat while the big story could also be the airstrike and murder of people. What happened in Yemen?
teri@discuss.tchncs.deto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•The basics of the Fediverse. Facebook, Twitter, Tiktok, Reddit, ... vs the Fediverse. What do you think?English
3·11 months agoIn thie fesiverse graphic each person has exactly 1 connection to a fediverse thing. But in reality, there can be more. I guess in practice there are often more than one.
Is tempting to check if it’s still down. But wom’t touch this ugly domain.
teri@discuss.tchncs.deto
Linux@lemmy.ml•I need to vent about Windows. I want workplaces to use Linux.
422·1 year agoWindows also used to show me the ugly face of Trump in the start menu even if I didn’t ask for it. That was more than 4 years ago. Recently was accidentally hovering over some ‘copilot’ button in Edge of a friend. And again - pop-up with Trump. So yes: fuck Windows, fuck Microsoft
teri@discuss.tchncs.deto
Technology@lemmy.world•Amazon is changing what is written in booksEnglish
1·1 year agodeleted by creator
teri@discuss.tchncs.deto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Tinder-alternatives for the FediverseEnglish
1·1 year agoHow about another type of control: by default your profile is not federated. Then you manually select the instances you trust. And your data getcs shared only with those. Dating usually is kind of local anyway. If i live in australiay I’m likely not interested in matches from the UK. So instances could already serve as some pre-selection based on your region and possibly community type.
teri@discuss.tchncs.deto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Tinder-alternatives for the FediverseEnglish
4·1 year agoMy last impression was that alovoa would need a lot of work still. It’s also the best thing I’ve seen so far but it’s very buggy unfortunately.
teri@discuss.tchncs.deto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Tinder-alternatives for the FediverseEnglish
2·1 year agoHow about doing some fine-grained control mechanism: you share little data publicly, then once somebody likes you, you can decide to share more with them. With some cryptography tricks should be possible to share this information only with the other person and not with their home servers.
I bet that what we see here is partly the work of the worlds largest propaganda machine. I’d like to believe that misinformation was the reason for them supporting Trump. So yes, properly informing people could help. But I’m worried that the Trumpian shit-show clogged some brains. What to believe in a world made of “fake news”?
I simply wonder what’s happening and expressing my frustration.
No question - it’s good he is mobilizing people. Organization is key, and to me it looks like it’s currently lacking. I really hope Sanders can change this.
It has been damn obvious and yet way too many people voted Trump. And, come on, it was clear Elon would be there as well. From outside the US it’s hard to understand why. It leaves me with two explanations, both of which I don’t like: either people were misinformed and/or did not understand what is going on, or they did really want it.
Maybe you can help me understand.
Wasn’t that obvious at very latest 4 years ago?
We need such statements now more than ever. Thank you Codeberg <3
teri@discuss.tchncs.deto
Linux@lemmy.ml•How do you, or do you vet if a software will paywall features or "enshittify"?
33·1 year agoGreen flags:
- copyleft license (GPL or better AGPL) + they accept contributions without contributor license agreement
- code written by many people who personally own the copyright
- active community
Yellow flags:
- permissive license
- business model which can’t be really be sustainable with a shit-free product
Red flags:
- VC funding (implies enshittification in future because of profit maximization)
- proprietary license
- project does not take contribution from the outside or asks to transfer copyright or sign some document (CLA)
teri@discuss.tchncs.deto
Technology@lemmy.world•Google Calendar removes Pride Month and Black History MonthEnglish
3·1 year agoGoogle has always been fuckers, they are still fuckers and going with the fascist flow they’ve proven that they will remain fuckers. Even if they switch side once the Trumpian monster stumbles, the can never be trusted.
This days it’s plain obvious. Before was slightly better hidden.
teri@discuss.tchncs.deto
Technology@lemmy.world•Google Calendar removes Pride Month and Black History MonthEnglish
7·1 year agoThey could decide not to give 1M to Trump, but they did: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/jan/09/google-microsoft-donate-trump-inaugural-fund They could use their reach and make a clear public statement: “we don’t support this”. But I’ve never seen any. They could give higher rating to actual useful information and try to show less fascist propaganda to people. I have to assume that’s going wrong as well.
Because of their giant impact, they send a message to all others. “We go with the fascists, we are not on the side of humanity but on the side of profit”. That creates dangerous dynamics.
teri@discuss.tchncs.deto
Technology@lemmy.world•Google Calendar removes Pride Month and Black History MonthEnglish
19·1 year agoIt was limiting them. To truly maximize profits they need to strip off all limits. I’m not joking. Really not. This is why capitalism and fascism go so well together.
teri@discuss.tchncs.deto
Technology@lemmy.world•Google Calendar removes Pride Month and Black History MonthEnglish
722·1 year agoGoogle managed to create a very clean image of themselves in most heads, but looking closer it is an ugly profit maximization machine. It cares about shareholders. If it cares about you, then probably for spying on you and learn how to manipulate you and others better. I hope people start realizing finally.
And let’s state it clear: Google could have a voice. They could object to the Musk-Thiel-Trumpian destruction machine. They could be there for the world. But they’re not. Not at all. They serve the money. And if it pays off, then they are willing to ruin peoples lives.
Google is on the wrong side of history.
teri@discuss.tchncs.deto
World News@lemmy.world•Trump’s proposed ‘land grabs’ mean US now seen as a risk, says Munich security reportEnglish
6·1 year agoLike it was not a risk before. People just didn’t want to see the obvious.




Seems like this source is know for disinformation and propaganda: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pravda_network