And that’s how you got a few examples which I don’t even redirect to? When I join a place or association, I typically do so having read the TOS and analyzing what I could expect to happen or not happen to me based on rule enforcement regarding the other person in the situation, not expecting what I’m led to be assured to be betrayed. Anyone who thinks I’m so extensively at fault is conflating me with others who take that role which is then used to make it easier to do and say I did something.

Like: The whole biography of Talos.

Dislike: The story of the Gordian knot.

This year. I even had to switch hobbies in a way.

Why does this surprise anyone? Doesn’t anyone know what terms of service are? This place is the same way.

Not everyone we persecute is in a leadership position with high amounts of pressure from the population to do the things we’re punishing them for.

Do they think nobody is going to replace them and resume the conflict?

The modlog, at least when I look at it, only has me banned once.

Anywho, what about the other things.

…which is/are?

For what?

You say all that as if the modlogs themselves don’t clarify, with “oops” being written as the registered reason for the temp-ban, that someone in charge had made a mistake (which you’re claiming credit for as an intended move on your behalf), or that the very thing we’re discussing didn’t have to be blown out of the water by the very person we speak of, especially as a certain point I made (going back to the same replies of mine about the supposed tearfulness) has been proven, as it’s been proven to be a trend everyone else in his camp (who, as experienced politicians, namely ones in the Democratic league, you’d think would just recognize this a part of the process) has been using, which everyone else just wants to be relieved of and look back on with spirits as I’ve been optimistic enough to do for these three days and are growingly fed up with as a far more maladaptive variation threatens to make it hard for people with more genuine issues to be taken seriously. For such reasons, with the horse’s mouth as a source, without breaking the rule of unnecessary downvoting as others are able to get away regarding you as they have to me as a demonstration of its enforcement, would one think it’s out of place that I call double standard regarding the four things I describe just now?

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod