…
Netflix being an application that is running on a TV seems like a very different situation than a video playing inside of a browser. How exactly would YouTube know or be able to stop screen recording short of forcing me to actively run a program?
Maybe I’m not following but this seems to be talking about applications communicating with hardware designed to be authorized to play.
How would a video playing on a browser like YouTube on my existing, old hardware be able to parse what’s authorized? Short of making YouTube a program on my computer, how does it on a browser know what else I’m running?
I already just use screen capture recording to take videos in my desktop playing YouTube on a browser. Could they even stop that?
Am I going to have to sit through an unreasonable amount of jiggling tits?
No not at all. The only boob jiggle type moment I can think of happens many episodes in and lasts about 5 seconds. Default throughout the show you aren’t getting constant creepshot angles or focus on fanservice. The show is, more or less, of a wholesome tone that sometimes dips into some series moments. There is a catgirl later on, but she’s actually like cat-girl with an emphasis on cat like behavior and is a good character who is dressed slightly lighter than everyone else but nothing you’d think twice of seeing.
The show is good. Developed characters and episode to episode they are usually focused on problem solving whatever is in their way to get to the next step for their overall goal.
I have no way to crop it that doesn’t have the background of where I live in view, so no cat pic here.
It was a completely sunny afternoon with a clear view of the highway (stressing afternoon which means the high had been in full sun all day to especially melt any possible ice), with the snow pushed aside two days ago, the highway salted on the days before the day in question; not a puddle or dark spot in sight on the highway.
No need for snow tires as it was direct tire to asphalt contact with no snow or ice on the highway itself. It was the best possible visibility for driving. If somebody is going 35 in those conditions on a 65 highway, they should not be driving.
Yesterday, on a 65mph limit highway that had been completely cleared of snow and ice (there was zero black ice) I encountered multiple cars going 55mph or slower. In one case about 35. I don’t understand.
Accumulating water
Is there a condition that accumulates water like that where weight goes up consistently over a long period of time?
I hesitated on where exactly to post this, but it seems more suited here than Patient Gamers which is mostly about getting relatively modern games that have hit bottom prices.
The 3rd person mode was a big difference. The levels are also different, while following the same general plot and premise.
When it comes to Tom Clancy games, GRAW is only second to Splinter Cell Double Agent when it comes to how wildly different releases of the “same” game are on different platforms.
If you think the number of people that use ad blockers is not a fraction of a percent of internet users, you’re in a bubble.
Nowhere near the majority, but also not a “fraction of a percent.”
Sadly no, I took the expedient route and exchanged money for it.
The holiday isn’t Santa’s to postpone. He is an avatar and caretaker of the Christmas spirit, not a dictator with control over it. Often in the ebin deep lore of these stories, Christmas itself has both power on the specific date which is needed by Santa, and it has a need for the rituals to be completed least it be damaged. Like an Aztec sacrifice to ensure the sun rises, it isn’t just the sort of thing you can delay.
The first words of the article:
So this is interesting. Just weeks after Google’s campaign to promote Android as being more secure than iPhone, the smartphone battle has taken a sudden twist.
The rule is essentially hidden if what I think are innocuous images contain a some image violating TOS. Which image is in violation? Which section of the TOS is it violating? I have no idea, therefore no idea how to follow the rule in the future.
They are not legally binding
So they have no duty of care with user’s personal data or privacy.
I don’t recall making a legal complaint. Something can be legal but mildly infuriating.
I use a variety for different things. My point isn’t imgur specifically, but how these hidden rules exist on different sites.
Can you dry fire it and rotate through every position? From what I’ve seen on revolvers sometimes a cylinder can be binding somewhere specific to the cylinder rotation.
You might also want to take every screw out of the frame to check and make sure none of them are broken which could be causing inconsistency.
I think every study like this should be looked at and considered as a work in progress and as information that doesn’t exist in a vacuum. Also, quotes like “This matches some anthropological estimates for early modern humans.” might be ones to consider, as other sources do agree that a lifespan in the 30s was at one point to be expected, but it began extending past that 30, 000 years ago. So when the original study talks about 30 as the upper end, is it looking at an age where an early hunter-gatherer type human would be unable to keep sustaining themselves with that lifestyle? Is it because they are no longer fit enough to keep hunting or is it because even if somebody else fed them that all the other circumstances would just pile on? Is the idea of DNA estimating lifespan also looking at the idea that once an organism ages to a certain point and slows down it statistically dies from predation as well? Since that is something humans as a whole have been able to get past with intelligence. I don’t know exactly how that all interacts, which is why looking at a lot of data is important before declaring something.
Which also brings up the idea of an average in relation to an expected lifespan. It is a commonly known tidbit that while the average lifespan in ancient and medieval times would usually be estimated somewhere in the 30s (depending on the exact era, location, and methodology), that’s an average dragged way down by infant mortality, and that people who made it out of childhood would have higher expected lifespans. I bring this up because looking at the OP linked study and then skimming a look at average lifespans might make the idea of DNA-destined-dead-by-30 a lock, when it really isn’t.
Obvious advancing medicine increases the population average lifespan. A human 30,000 years ago born with diabetes probably wouldn’t make it very long while one born these days with proper medication lives much longer. Does seeing the population average lifespan number go up have any relation to another individual, specific human who doesn’t have any sort of chronic illness? No, so again just looking at raw population averages as just one way of looking at expected lifespan is something to keep in mind.
The conclusion is that it’s an interesting study to keep as a link, and use as one piece of data if you’re really interested in gathering more information.
I guess I’m still not following how if I’m using say the nvidia geforce screen recording software which is capturing the display of my screen how the browser knows. Since the browsers has already gotten the image and displayed it and the recorder is recording the display instead of, intercepting (I suppose is the best word) the data before it is displayed.