Yes, but then the implications is that tariff is not the root cause, it just helped the real problems crush the business faster

I think Russia tends to be a different story because it causes uncertainty in their backyard. It is a large scale war, that threatens to spill into Europe “proper”, and that’s bad for trading and the economy in the EU.

I agree that, for most people, there is still a degree of racism, but I still think that Billionaires look primarily at your wallet (ex: Sunak is in all “proper” circles in the UK, Indian or not) and you race secondly.

IMHO l, racism is a tool to keep the poor from talking about classism. So after years of propaganda about it, it’s a problem that mostly affect the poor, while they get fucked in their wallet

Elita support genocide as long as they get paid.

Which kind of takes out the racism, but I’m not sure it makes it better. See also them turning their head to Rwanda, the Arabs slavery and so on, as long as they invest in western companies.

Palestinian fault’s was apparently to not invest in some shitty football team

Are you a Republican? Because that really sounds like “mine works, so fuck everyone else”

It only works when you are near an election, and the election are coming. This administration is working on a different path: at least one year before the next election and is actively working to make sure (fair) elections might not happen anymore

That’s assuming that whoever didn’t vote disapprove of him, and that’s false.

Whoever didn’t vote, was comfortable enough to not oppose him (or Kamala for that matter) and let him get to the white house.

We are already fucked. The choices given are siding with Trump, and end up like Russia, or side with Elon, and end up like Cyberpunk 2077

Amazing. Thanks!

Wouldnt be the opposite? What’s keeping the plates together is vacuum. What it needs is to heat the gas inside to make it expand and reduce the vacuum

From the dictionary: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/whore

3. a mercenary or unscrupulous person : a person who is willing to compromise their integrity or principles for personal gain or in pursuit of something

I think you might be the only person who read the comment, and immediately think about the sexual meaning of this.

What I agree with you though, it that the term is mostly applied to women, hence why I was looking for a term that can be applied easily to men such as Ted Cruz (the master whore), or McConnell. Plenty of whoring in the Republican party males.

Its quite upsetting that when this behavior is done by males, we always try to find other slurs (sleazy etc), and when a woman do it, this one always comes out first. It should be applied equally. But that said, again, its the perfect description for what she is doing atm.

Tbh is pretty accurate. My only wish is we had some good equivalent term for males, because the Republican party is chock-full of male goldigging whores

Trump is too moronic to be paranoid

Ferrari and Lambo are still cars, with how they are ripping off the middle class, there should be enough billionaires

Kowalski, status report.

What you are suggesting is even more dangerous though. Law immunity for politicians is even worse

Not really, for the same reasons Russia’s economy is now in the shitter: sure they could sell oil to another country, but changing the whole infrastructure is not something that can be done in days. Same with moving the whole production of goods to a completely new country.

Also consider that nowadays western countries have lost the knowhow to produce efficiently goods (while their service industry still remains unmatched)

Doesn’t matter, they ll die by measels before anyway

What I meant is:

Propaganda is writing 0.99 with the intention of tricking people into buying. Note here to purpose of writing 99 is used.

Casualties was born from the necessity of generals to know how many troops are available. There is no psychological trick in there. Just because civilians misinterpret it does not mean there is a propagandistic goal hidden somewhere.

See the difference?

Lost means “not able to fight”. If they lose a leg, they might be alive, but not very useful in the battlefield. Therefore the soldier, not the human, is lost.

Most of it it’s because in military setting, those two are equivalent, sine the only thing they care is about how many abled bodies they have available for the meat grinder.

Including wounded is the official definition of lost, always been. No need to call propaganda, it simply how is defined.