fr no cap

It gives you the option to

They can be dickish about several things, but they will implement whatever they want, it’s their project LOL! They actually develop a mobile operating system for people afraid of being hacked, and with the utmost security in mind.

The thing with pattern unlock is that it is inherently less secure than the other options, despite the fact that you can use one of the other options in bad ways (like the ‘0000’ PIN). Expecting them to change this is using the lowest common denominator possible, which is against their philosophy.

You do have other options if you want to deGoogle, like LineageOS, that supports a much wider range of devices (altough the extent of deGoogling can be limited). It’s good we have one ROM (among others) with paranoid devs - we have more options

I love Fairphones, but GrapheneOS developers are very clear on why they son’t support phones other than Pixels. If other phones complied with those requirements, they would support them. I really hoped the OEM they’re working with to support from another brand would be Fairphone, but the most educated guess I’ve seen is Motorola

this seems to be going the shittitest direction it could…fuck Google

ps: loving the apple simps coming out to claim iPhones aren’t perfect just because you can’t “sideload” lool

and I love you

the only good IA gen clip I’ve seen. but I’m biased since I’ve loved everything from Igorrr

Xzibit

he’s pirating his stuff, he’s already a cool guy in my book

with proton, pirating shit from windoes on linux is the best!

actually, years ago there was a long drawn out drama about people in Signal’s team refusing to publish on F-Droid because of “security concerns” in Moxie’s time. IIRC they worked to take down builds on the main repo

you can probably still find the old github threads with the lenghty discussions

I’ve just seen it. I suppose Signal-FOSS has the same signature, since I can choose between the two repos on its F-Droid panel

since when? that’s good news to me!

the alternatives seem to be Molly on the main repo and Signal-FOSS on TwinHelix’s

talk about a n irrelevant comment! you’re informing us you’ve blocked someone, hahaha

thanks for the pic, it’s good to share with friends who are curious!

this. thank you

x86_64

this, twenty times

the most relevant comment

omg, thank you. i just learnt about the “tags” function that I’ve always assumed worked differently without even trying it