People are different. For me some purple actually is good. As opposed to green on computer displays. Real green is very good, of course.

Any non-neutral color is hard though.

I’m autistic, so talking about “common sense” might be funny, but - IP is technically an extension of contract law to a very abstract area. If we are being this rigid, then sovereign citizens must too have a say in politics. If we are being this rigid, then I want all Turks gone (or sworn fealty to me, LOL) from Khodorchur, Dayq province of Western Armenia. If we are being this rigid, then all governments in the world are illegal.

You get the idea.

And if we are, then why won’t we be even more rigid and ask how can one own a number? Which is ultimately any intellectual property. Piece of information is not a blockable resource.

And if we are not, then I don’t see any public value in an institution that harms people.

And there’s none, this is purely a device of power. When you realize this, and look at other such devices of power, you also realize that your society (as one that, well, imposed such IP laws on most of the world as a condition for economic interaction) is not free.

Shut down themselves even better.

Even those guys are getting some understanding of modern warfare, wow.

BTW, I know that shouldn’t be too public, but are NATO countries doing this? Because Hollywood movies are good and all, but this is the revolution that has already happened, like tercios. I mean cheap mass-produced drones. One can talk quality-over-quantity all one wants, but there’s no way one wins against a well-organized equal force possessing those in good numbers. And level of organization is something hard to predict and developed by experience, so hoping for Russia and NK and China and who not remaining clumsy would not be wise.

I know those terms. I wanted to edit it, but was too lazy. You still did understand what I meant, right?

We don’t call a shell script “AI” after all, and we do call those models that, while for your definition there shouldn’t be any difference.

The real Skype was fine.

This Skype, I think, is just an ugly version of Teams.

Someone in here has once linked me a scientific article about how today’s “AI” are basically one level below what they need to be anything like an AI. A bit like the difference between exponent and Ackermann function, but I really forgot what that was all about.

Is WoW still that popular though?..

No. You are damn fucking well illustrating what I said, though.

This doesn’t make any sense.

Ahem, well, there are obvious things - that 2x2 modulo 3 is 1, that some vaccines might be bad, that’s why farma industry regulations exist, that pi is also unknown p multiplied by unknown i or some number encoded as ‘pi’ string.

These all matter for language models, do they not?

And you want an Ai that doesn’t offend these folks / is taught based on their output. What use could that be of?

It is already taught on their output among other things.

But I personally don’t think this leads anywhere.

Somebody someplace decided it’s a genial idea to extrapolate text, because humans communicate their thoughts via text, so it’s something that can be used for machines.

Humans don’t just communicate.

Thx, also the whole idea, I think, is presented better in Tao Te Ching.

You haven’t made any preposterous claims about my supposedly existing theories on climate change.

You don’t learn, do you?

My theories?

I mean, this is an example. A liberal trying to start an argument with saying things that are false, but in his opinion will lead to something good.

It would be the same with liberal talking points and in general any human talking point.

Humans try to change the reality the way they want it, thus things they say are always incorrect. When they want to increase something, they make it appear less than IRL, usually. Also appearances are not universal.

Humans also simplify things acceptably for one subject, but not for another.

Humans also don’t know what “correct information” is.

A lot of philosophy connected to language starts mattering, when your main approach to “AI” is text extrapolation.

Alternative facts, alternative liftoff, alternative attack, alternative growth, alternative survival

(It’s just a joke in Russia about state media using the word “negative” instead of alternative is similar cases to describe things falling apart)

Boris Johnson also knows a thing or two about homoerotic stuff, UK good schools and all.

They’ll likely want specialists from the one that does. Hence the culture.

Also they weren’t very careful with that donor money. They could afford to lose it, if they’d cut spending on various kinds of stupid advertising. Half the media would turn against them, but that’d have upsides too - in the exact area of swaying Trump votes, both those voting contrarian and those voting for destructive change.