The change for EEA users doesn’t even work currently, so no one actually knows. I have a $50 bounty out though to figure out what’s needed once it does work though.
The change for EEA users doesn’t even work currently, so no one actually knows. I have a $50 bounty out though to figure out what’s needed once it does work though.
This doesn’t even work currently. Despite them saying that those in the EEA won’t have to deal with Edge. I’m sure it’ll work eventually, just not right now.
Ark Survival Evolved?
Star Trek Voyager /j
That comments a spy!
I haven’t played it, but maybe Hello Neighbor?
Is there a space bound monkey tragedy involved?
Instead of spaces? Not necessarily but it helps prevent edge cases
Teams Fight over Rocks. Rarely they play a form of soccer or against robots. Some characters throw suspiciously colored fluids on other players. There are cosmetics
Do you have cruise control set?
Content is up but users are down. Take that as you will.
Replacement to Lemmy if Lemmy ever paywall the API
Launchdarkly is likely a culprit as well. Just doing a background search reveals that the service allows dev teams to do A/B testing, enable new features without releasing a new version, and various other “dynamic” functions.
OP is on the wrong side of Occam’s razor
Ads & Analytics, like most things.
https://developers.facebook.com/docs/graph-api/overview/
Wouldn’t surprise me if there’s an in-app ad / self promotion / community announcements / et al that is managed via FB’s Graph API
I’ve ruled out a good amount of leads but I have not had contact with the admin yet :(
Pull android logs (logcat tools/android debugging)
Find the date and time of the package being installed
Correlate the install time with where they were at that time
Use that information to get an anti stalking order
Contact your local District Attorney to see if they can assist with a wiretapping filing
deleted by creator
These aren’t demands, but I can definitely see how they can come off that way. These are industry standard post cybersecurity incident review questions by defined by NIST (NIST SP 800-61 Rev 2 Section 3.4.1) slightly rephrased.
To add context to this. What I’ve been told is that a community running on a lemmy fork with 5 digit users had used this code for a while and backported(?) the code upstream when they federated back. I guessing there was an assumption of safety as they had been using the custom emojis code for quite a while without it being exploited.
This better be angry Torvalds
Edit: It was