• 0 Posts
  • 13 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2024

help-circle

  • The words are all still stupid because it’s a new thing, but there is one specific space that I find it just impossible to deny the way that there are already tools on the market that change the way the job is done:

    Claude can turn plain english statements about what data I want from what different parts of the Microsoft 365 administration ecosphere into scripts that take all that data, transform it the way I want it transformed, and turn it into spreadsheets, pivot tables, data manipulation macros, and everything else I need to answer questions which are really hard to answer from the MS web interface. I can ask things like “Which systems have any of these three known vulnerable apps?” or “What software is common to everyone working in this division of the company?”

    It’s boring stuff, but it makes a world of difference in terms of what I can look at to base my decisions on. I spent less time building repeatable reports for each type of object I need to think about (device, application, user) than I did building even one report for one assessment in years past without automation. And it’s not constantly asking the LLM to do things for me, it’s building a couple of tools with a much faster iterative process for feature tweaks or debugging than could take place as an interaction between two people. I was making changes to scripts

    I’m using it only for specific work areas where I already know the APIs I just don’t have the time to stumble through the gather and collate of the various data. Based on the level of complexity of the tools I’ve been able to build I would say that anybody who knows how to describe the data they work with most could use a tool like this to make that process a lot more automatic. We’re not ready for the tool to do the work without human oversight, but we’re ready for anybody who works with stacks of data to build their own automation instead of having it built for them.






  • Everyone who perceived the Harris pivot as “playing to lose” has ideas about it. We’re over-represented on Lemmy as compared with the voting public. The Republican party has been sufficiently horrifying for sufficiently long, that there is an entire generation of voters who “lean left”, but have no idea where to even begin actually holding their party accountable for things.

    In 1984 Jesse Jackson had his Rainbow Coalition, but they gave us Walter Mondale. The same thing happened with Bernie in both 2016 and 2020. In the USA there is a capitalist part and a fash party, and no room is permitted on the stage for anything other than tightly controlled powerless opposition.



  • I accept your take fully. Here’s why I still love it:

    I have docks in any location where I plan to work for an extended period of time. “The smallest device which can run x86/x64 code” is what I look for in the handheld device I carry around with me that isn’t company issued.

    You’re right about one thing, though. It and the surface go 2 before it are items I targeted when I saw the use that others were getting out of their iOS and Android tablets. I wanted a device that still gives me access to calibre for e-book sorting and the time waste-y low resource usage portion of my steam library even if I’m on an airplane. The pocket, as well as a charger, a slim bluetooth mouse, and an e-reader all fit in a pouch not much larger than a case for a study bible. I can pull that out of my travel backpack and tuck it in the pocket of the seat in front of me, then I don’t have to fight with any of my carry-on luggage during the flight. I take a bluetooth controller or two with me if I’m going to be somewhere for more than a few days, and then when I’m back at the hotel I can hook this same tiny device up to the TV in the hotel room and play emulated games or resource friendly steam games.

    I’ve been using laptops my whole life, and it seems like whenever I’m using the built in display, it’s already a poor environment for productivity. Portability gets my attention in its stead.





  • You’re weird. I’m weird. We both know that weird is where it’s at, and the worst thing either of us could aspire to be is “normal”.

    This strategy is about rattling folks whose identity is still external rather than internal. Introspection surrounding the idea of “weirdness” is the goal.

    The expectation to conform to a set of principles foisted upon you by superiors is the idea that we’re fighting against. The people who support that way of thinking want wealth consolidation, conformity, and all others in cages. Weird is a dang battle cry in the face of something so oppressively ordinary.