He still thinks a trade deficit is bad.
Goddamn
He still thinks a trade deficit is bad.
Goddamn
That works too. It just needs to get caught in a single prop for it to go down
You know, there’s no reason we can’t have anti-drone fireworks.
They don’t really even need dangerous amounts of explosives, they just need a strong net to get caught in a prop.
Drones are pretty damn slow if you compare it to a rocket.
Man, Mao’s policies got so many people killed that “only” 3-4m people died of famine.
He’s got an incredible kill count.
See here I was thinking that’s be crazy but I’d rather do that
That’s one thing I appreciate about Lemmy. Without a doubt you are all people of logic.
For a moment, I thought “hmm. What if we all said ‘No, I shot Brian Thompson’” sort of like what happened in Spartacus, but then I remembered that all 6000 slaves or whatnot were executed
The act must be committed with the intent to intimidate or coerce a civilian population or influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion
No, see, that’s clearly false. The civilian population did not get intimidated or coerced by fuck and all, and the government wasn’t threatened.
So, nope. Not guilty.
Engineers tend to be less accepting of the “debate and theory” part of science and more of the “analyze and act” part.
As in, the debate is stupid, the theory is that the rich have fucked us all, now let’s see what we can do immediately to make it work.
Fight porn is not what I was hoping for, yet not exactly disappointed in the result.
Destabilize?
No, this is far worse. Big banks will just take your money. Credit Unions? I have no fucking idea.
I also can’t just walk into my bank and pull out $10k without raising all sorts of questions and concerns.
Jesus fuck.
With the exact same number of weapons and ammo. Stuff ain’t cheap or easy to come by, plus they can use rocks.