But it’s nonsense and shallow.

The liquid keeps it stable and absorbs movement, right?

Neoliberalism isn’t about liberal or left ideals.

It’s just about being free to conduct capitalism. It’s about a way of maintaining power.

TikTok isn’t a fad. Just like how YouTube isn’t. At the least I don’t see how another new video platform would bootstrap to compete.

Yeah, it’s easy to take too much.

Nancy Mace sounds like something a trans woman would keep in her purse for self defense.

They all want to control the narrative on social media. And to destroy traditional media.

Thanks for the link.

So you’re saying social media isn’t a cesspool? That’s what these quotes are highlighting.

You don’t need to argue with my comment, a comment that quotes the article like that. It’s not suggesting this was a “both sides” situation, and that Kirk had upsides. It’s pointing out polarization, and lack of decorum, lack of sensitivity, a pressure to race to post, gross incentives for profit and many other toxic properties of social media.

Kirk was a shithead. Don’t get me wrong. But, all your reply is is restating facts about Kirk and the right wings tactics and not discussion about the topic of the article.

I specifically quoted these in hope of replies that were not just statements that reflect one side of the toxic discourse. Even if they are correct and factual about Kirk and the corrosive rhetoric he and his organization peddle.

The article is about extreme polarization. And polarization means there is no nuance. Nuance would be following the facts, not making up ones own lies about the radical left.

The article is about talking past each other instead of with each other. The article is about people just posting their views instead of engaging with others in a nuanced way.

“Lack of Nuance” here is talked about broadly as a property of social media platforms. Not as a property of Kirk.

But Hemmer added, the choice of others to reshare [graphic content] is driven by the fact that social media “rewards this kind of extreme content.” Many who re-shared the images are making money and gaining followers off of it, she notes. “That’s just part of the incentive structure of media today,” she said.

…Nuance fails in online platforms designed to boost and sustain engagement and promote content likely to provoke a reaction from users. Already, social media pundits on the left are questioning whether the texts and interviews in the charging documents are real. Meanwhile, those on the right are agitating to declare left wing activists as terrorists.

Yup, Trump is so simple like that.

I know. 😔

I mostly share these feelings because it illuminates the issue a bit for some people who otherwise have not considered it.

Ah, good point. I guess things would rapidly re-form in the favor of the fediverse if this law was overturned…

Sounds like a monkey paw situation to me!

Yet again, we have difficulty having shared definitions of the most basic words.

We really need to address this some day. So much conflict will go away once we stop arguing about the definitions of words.

Maybe words are too imprecise, and we need something else. But on the other hand, we have precise words for lots of things. But it’s considered elitist or whatever to use them. “$10 words” are often just very precise and replace a bunch of other words in a sentence.

Well, it’ll be a difficult transition. But in the long run, maybe not?

As long as the Fourth Estate gets their shit together.

It shuts down Truth social and all social networks. YouTube stops allowing uploads, the fediverse closes up shop, cats and dogs living together.

There is no Radical honesty on Truth social.

This is how I understood it too.