I waddled onto the beach and stole found a computer to use.

🍁⚕️ 💽

Note: I’m moderating a handful of communities in more of a caretaker role. If you want to take one on, send me a message and I’ll share more info :)

  • 384 Posts
  • 1.89K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 5th, 2023

help-circle














  • IMO there’s a difference between the vibe coded one-shot projects (which tend to have those AI generated looking websites), and using LLMs for targeted and focussed suggestions. The contents of that file and a quick skim of the PRs and commits doesn’t change my mind on that, the project still looks like it’s made by competent developers who may or may not use AI for debugging/brainstorming.

    I know some people will still prefer having zero AI usage and that’s fine too. For me their AI use doesn’t meet the threshold for me to have doubts about the quality and longevity of the product.

    I also found this: their website / blog uses the Eleventy static site generator: https://github.com/bonfire-networks/website-blog


  • They’re probably using a static site template, maybe Astro.

    They’ve put a lot of work into Bonfire, off the top of my head

    • working with activitypub stakeholders to get a proper standard for groups (which helps us directly)
    • tooling for other platforms to use
    • a separate platform focussed on academics with integrations to academia services

    It’s far from some vibe coded project



  • I don’t think that’s what happened?

    There is a discussion to be had about why the ICC is better at getting justice in some regions over others, but that also shouldn’t mean that we just give up altogether. Victims in the global south deserve justice too. That includes those in the Central African Republic, many of which are from the same race and ethnic background as him.

    https://www.hrw.org/news/2026/09/23/central-african-republic-icc-verdict-in-seleka-commander-case

    (The Hague) – The International Criminal Court (ICC)’s conviction of Mahamat Said Abdel Kani for crimes against humanity in the Central African Republic offers an important measure of long-awaited justice for victims of the abusive Seleka armed group, Human Rights Watch said today.

    In 2012, the predominantly Muslim Seleka rebels ousted the Central African Republic president, François Bozizé, and seized power through a campaign of violence and terror. In March 2013, the Seleka took control of Bangui, the capital, attacking civilians and pillaging the city. In late 2013, Christian and animist militias known as anti-balaka, began to organize counterattacks against the Seleka. Both the Seleka and anti-balaka have been implicated in widespread atrocities against civilians.

    https://www.dw.com/en/icc-convicts-car-ex-rebel-leader-of-crimes-against-humanity/a-79387178

    Prosecutors allege that prisoners at the facility, who were suspected supporters of Bozize, were subjected to various forms of torture, including whippings and body mutilation.

    According to the court, inmates were also denied food or water, with some drinking their own urine out of desperation.

    One cell, dubbed “the hole,” where prisoners were held in dire conditions, was said by the court to be directly under Said’s office.

    Meanwhile the americans are trying to dismantle the court

    Said’s verdict comes at a time when the ICC is facing extreme pressure. In February 2025, US President Donald Trump issued an executive order authorizing sanctions on ICC officials and others supporting the court’s work. Since then, the US government has imposed sanctions on ICC officials and staff, a UN expert, and three leading Palestinian human rights organizations. Together with three other human rights groups, Human Rights Watch has sued the Trump administration in a US court over its sanctions targeting the ICC.


  • They have a well known baby formula scandal too. They used unethical advertising practices to get women in developing countries started on free baby formula, and then the women had to keep buying the formula when the natural lactation stopped.

    They would then have trouble sourcing clean water and clean equipment, causing the babies to get sick. They would also try to stretch the formula because of financial limitations, and the babies would be malnourished

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1977_Nestlé_boycott

    Advocacy groups and charities have accused Nestlé of unethical methods of promoting infant formula over breast milk to poor mothers in developing countries.[23][24] For example, IBFAN claims that Nestlé distributes free formula samples to hospitals and maternity wards; after leaving the hospital, the formula is no longer free, but because the supplementation has interfered with lactation, the family must continue to buy the formula. IBFAN also alleges that Nestlé uses “humanitarian aid” to create markets, does not label its products in a language appropriate to the countries where they are sold, and offers gifts and sponsorship to influence health workers to promote its products.[25] The company not only made use of mass media promotion (e.g. billboards and posters) and sample distributions, they also had sales people dressed as so-called “milk nurses” to visit mothers in hospital and at their home to praise formula and its benefits.[26][27][10] Nestlé justified its actions by rejecting the responsibility for e.g. the lack of clean water in many developing countries and further argued with freedom of consumer choice, which in the company’s opinion allows for formula products to be sold in developing markets



  • IMO that’s not the issue

    The issue is the lack of safeguards. In our rush to call out the dad based on the headline, we shouldn’t let Google and the banks off the hook. The dad should have set limits on the card/account and paid closer attention to the kid’s view/ad activities, but both google and the banks benefitted from the poor design/usability issues that led to this.

    EDIT: Since it was the company card, maybe the dad couldn’t have set limits on there. He used the company card on an older purchase, and since it was tied to his account, google offered the card as a payment option when the kid went to boost his ad. While I’m at it, screw the advertising industry that made YouTube into the mess it is now.

    As for this bit

    why is a 9 year old even allowed to post to YouTube

    I remember about 15 years ago, a lot of kids wanted to post gameplay videos and music/art they made to YouTube. Some parents handled that poorly yes, but others took the time to watch the videos and approve them before anything was uploaded.

    Kids want to explore their interests and it can be healthy to explore it with them, and teach them things along the way. Telling them no outright might push them to do it anyway, but this time without supervision.