Because the outcome of that “statistic” highlights phev as a bad purchase. It took far more scandal and coverup exposing to reveal more egregious figures from ice cars, for example the Volkswagen testing thing.

If fuel economy can be tempered with real-world use effects for ice cars, the bigger picture is warranted for this study as well.

That is not how icebergs form.

How would plastic bottles have ended up inside glaciers formed by falling snow?

deleted by creator

In a world where the boogeymen of Palantir and nation-state bad actors plundering personal data are actually real, saying “no one is asking kids to send their data” is beyond naive, it’s putting your head in the sand.

This is why the age verification thing is bad… IT ISNT ABOUT THE KIDS.

Both the motivation and the goal of these checkpass type systems is to collect your data!

You think its OK to ask kids for this info who don’t know any better?

Depending on your use cases this can be completely acceptable.

No, it isn’t. Think about what you are saying.

No one is using alcohol or mercury except in outdoor thermometers. Electronic thermometers are a solved problem.

You are arguing the equivalent of the merits of lead additives in gasoline in a world that is looking for fuel alternatives.

My apologies, a phonological transcription error.

lol, that’s just fake.

Look, of you’re going to quote Wikipedia on Chomsky, at least do some of the required reading:

• Chomsky publicly reviled Bolchevism, yet actively advocated for a “social revolution” using the exact same mechanisms. When questioned in a recorded interview on this point in 1974, he got up and left.
• Speaking of old-world, anticapitalist “social renegade” behaviour, he famously endorsed Mao Tse Tung and Fidel Castro as aspirational figures. Many of the 60s left were led astray by these figures, but Chomsky was one of the stubborn few who refused to recant their support, even after it became apparent that both had been revealed to be as power-hungry as the establishments they claimed to fight.

“When he provided this endorsement of what he called Mao Tse-tung’s “relatively livable” and “just society,” Chomsky was probably unaware he was speaking only five years after the end of the great Chinese famine of 1958–1962, the worst in human history.”

Chomsky also continued to crow about the stellar merits of USSR agricultural output, and when presented with the discovery that they had forged the numbers in an effort to appear more productive, he did not change this support.

• Chomsky defended and rationalized violence as a legitimate means to social change, and by extension, praised authoritarian leaders on their methods and policies.
• He also wasn’t shy about rubbing elbows with the “elite”, so it should come as no big surprise that he had ties to Epstein. The fact that his wife knew of the association and only addressed it once public should tingle your Spidey sense.
• Chomsky’s “Universal Grammar” theory has been largely debunked as armchair psychology.
• Modern times are proving Chompsky was full of shit: https://www.toolify.ai/gpts/the-revolution-in-language-models-debunking-chomskys-theory-143628
• similarly, Chomsky’s “poverty of the stimulus” theory of language development has also been proven to be garbage.

Anecdotally, I studied linguistics in the late 90s and we were specifically prohibited from quoting Chomsky in my syntax, phonology, and semantics courses. That’s how much respect he commanded in the actual academic community. Thirty years ago.

He had some interesting ideas about language development in the 70s which have mostly been debunked since (by people who actually knew what they were talking about).

Noam Chomspky has always been a blowhard.

This is the nature of modern, post ww2 foreign policy.

If you see only absolute adherence to your country’s values as good and non-adherence as bad, you will end up in the terrible position of absolutist states like north Korea and Turkmenistan. In these places, leaders enjoy a good life and the average citizen has very few options beyond just existing miserably.

The world is not black and white and there is no such thing as a perfect trading partner.

Whoah, what the fuck. Do you live in a Joseph Conrad novel??

Not a ham radio operator

agile frequency hopping with a random key

No kidding.

The US directly made China as economically powerful as it currently is.

Not really. We have had access to ml for a while and google used ml to blur license plates in streetview for a long time now. It’s just pattern recognition with reinforcement.

Neural learning has been around since 2004-ish.

I know. You can’t make this shit up.

I’m glad my poor old dad isn’t alive to see this.

Edit: I mean, I wish he weren’t dead, but this would upset him greatly.

We are certain.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/us-nigeria-airstrike-christmas-day-9.7028229

Well, I felt you were drawing relevance away from the initial intent of the quoted maxim. Regardless, looks like I might have overreacted. Let’s just chalk this up to internet comments.

Oh, my apologies.

I didn’t realize you were being intractable.

Is it, though? Has the system been keeping us down, or are the ppl in charge just stupid and greedy? Assigning intent makes the unfairness sting less.