• 0 Posts
  • 198 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 18th, 2023

help-circle
  • I’ll take the downvotes to point out the political reality:

    Raising money is literally the DNC’s primary role. It is a coalition of people raising money collaboratively, with the understanding that agreeing to the party policy as a group is a requirement for being a member of the group.

    So when he says that Hogg is stealing his spotlight and making it difficult to build the network he needs to raise funds, he’s not out of line.

    He is INCREDIBLY shortsighted in failing to connect “supporting good candidates” with “ability to secure votes” which itself is a necessary component of long term fundraising. But let’s call a spade a spade: raising money is what the DNC is all about, by definition, and without those funds they have no purpose, let alone ability to promote candidates



  • This is misleading and dangerous rhetoric.

    Autonomous vehicles - actual autonomous ones, not Tesla bullshit marketing “self-driving” - are already significantly safer than human drivers. Yes, they are limited to certain conditions (they don’t handle inclement weather very well yet) but the point is that they are already improving safety over human drivers.

    Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.

    Additionally, once autonomous vehicles become the standard, you will see a dramatic shift in how the insurance industry operates.

    Think about it: if I’m not the one driving, why would I be the one taking on liability? I wouldn’t. The manufacturer would. Suddenly, the insurance industry would be targeting vehicle/software producers instead of individuals. And anyone who chooses to drive themselves anyway? They would almost always be liable by default. Premiums for drivers would skyrocket and this would be a huge disincentive to getting behind the wheel in the first place.

    Don’t. Let. The. Perfect. Be. The. Enemy. Of. The. Good.

    We all lose out. And it costs lives.








  • Go pirate. That’s what I do when shit doesn’t work.

    I just don’t also fool myself into thinking they will ever change their ways so long as it’s profitable 🤷

    I’m not saying you’re wrong. Nor am I telling you to accept the shitty quality stream as the best you can get. I’m just saying this is how the system is set up right now and it’s not a Netflix problem. It’s a capitalism problem.


  • neatchee@lemmy.worldtoMildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldNetflix bad... Shocker, I know
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Big corps like Netflix only care about supporting the 90% of users to who operate in a bog-standard configuration. They really couldn’t care less about supporting things like reverse engineered AirPlay, debloated Windows, Linux running on a Mac, or anything else that’s not damn near configured exactly as it was when it was first removed from the box.

    It is not worth the engineering investment to make it work. They would spend more money maintaining these features than they would earn from it.

    You can have whatever opinions you want about that reality, but that’s just how it is. Blame capitalism.


  • Interestingly there is a body of research that suggests enjoyment of music comes from having exactly one of two things, never both:

    Familiarity and predictability

    If it’s neither familiar nor predictable, it is inscrutable and therefore discomforting to listen to

    If it is both familiar and predictable it is boring

    If it’s familiar but unpredictable, it feels like a journey through known emotions

    If it’s predictable but unfamiliar it feels like ‘logical discovery’ and is fun and satisfying

    A bit reductive but I love this idea




  • I think we have far more that we agree on in this conversation than we disagree on. We can get into the minutiae of specific UIs but that probably misses the point.

    Where I agree with OP is on the first impression of the default Lemmy UI to users trying to migrate from big-corpo products

    For better or worse, these folks have come to believe that “slick looking” = thoughtfully designed = featureful and advanced. And that “sterile/boring looking” = amateur UX design = complicated and difficult

    We can’t break that mentality in the general public by simply repeating over and over that they’re wrong. It just doesn’t work that way, sadly.

    On my Mastodon server, we have the Elk frontend available and have it listed prominently right next to the sign-up/sign-in button as a “Twitter-friendly UI experience” (also on our About page). Then, we periodically throw up an announcement telling users that apps, Elk, etc don’t provide all of the features available on the modified webUI/PWA, along with a list of what they’re missing and how to learn more.

    It’s an “abopt, extend, extinguish” approach and it works. There’s a reason corporate enshitification pioneered that strategy. We can use it too, but for good :)


  • If the goal of Lemmy - and specifically lemmy.world is to be a boutique, niche aggregator then fine. But that is explicitly NOT the goal. That may be what some users want but they are free to go form their own small servers and isolate as much as they want

    I am not suggesting that every community needs to be growth-oriented. Small groups are great.

    But they are also weak, and virtually incapable of creating and maintaining the systemic change required to protect themselves long term.

    If the attitude is “let the capitalists take over everything else, I’m happy with my underground movement that struggles to survive” then that’s honestly bordering on selfish. “I’m happy so I don’t care about what happens to others. They can figure out how to find us and do what we do or get fucked” kind of energy. It’s privileged in the extreme

    The best way for small communities to thrive is through collective action. And in order for that to happen there need to be enough small communities to have any sort of influence as a collective. And in order for that to happen, there needs to be an entry-point into the collective that is accessible to newcomers.

    That is what Lemmy - and especially lemmy.world - have positioned themselves to be. It’s not dissimilar to Mastodon(.social)