They’re on .ml that usually means they’re an insane tankie and best to just ignore them

Although I think I lean to the it shouldn’t be tracked the way it currently is, to further your point we do track other visual things by which people are discriminated against such as race.

Yes I can make the case. My case: doesthedogdie exists. I know a lot of people who get more upset about seeing an animal hurt than human on human violence.

Who gets to arbitrarily decide which is important? So what if it balloons? Again, the more info the better imo.

I mean people are vaguely aware of them for that reason, I remember the first Deadpool being rated R was part of the marketing, but that’s about it.

Most parents I know ignore them and get more detailed info to help them decide, and non parents just already watch whatever.

Not really creating problems. It would mean people who forget to check https://www.doesthedogdie.com/ can have a heads up. Having more info is not a bad thing. People can then figure out if it’s looney tunes or if it’s pet abuse. I didn’t see how you can on one hand argue for more clear info in ratings and then argue against it.

And an “A” for animal abuse.

But seriously, movie ratings are a joke and basically no one pays attention to them that I know.

Really ready for Ukraine to nuke more data centers so we can lose more of these tankie bots

Yep, I went back to Betamax.

Depending on what the money is for, this is exactly how I use CDs.

I’ve generally found companies that make interviewing it’s own esoteric challenge are not places you want to work at anyways.

Most ADHD meds would likely fall under “uppers” (amphetamines). Many antidepressants probably would be labeled “uppers” though they aren’t stimulants in quite that way. Many steroids are prescribed for various things (I’ve been given them to try and kick a nasal infection without using antibiotics) and would probably be considered “uppers”.

I’m sure there’s more I’m forgetting.

As an adult with a family, this won’t be accepted anymore.

Says who? Like if it’s your clothes your room your life, do it your way.

Signed. A couple who hasn’t folded clothes in months

This is great progress. Curious to see how the Supreme Court eventually rules

I’ve used various wireless mice for a years, though still use wired for gaming so I don’t have to worry about battery (even this many new nice get 12+ hours wireless now). As with anything quality matters. Buy an unknown $5 mouse and yeah you likely will have issues, buy a Razer Deathadder v3 or Logitech whatever, something known and decent, and you’ll never have an issue.

Exactly. It’s all arbitrary. So I get up at 8 or get up at 7. I don’t care. Just let it be consistent

I think they mean if the advertised product. So like if Kleenex buys the ad space they’ll let kleenex know they’re boycotting them and why, not Microsoft.

They’d likely license as a percentage of revenue, not a specific dollar amount, which would make it more available to every studio and they’d theoretically make more money from the added ad revenue.

Until they license this out to every triple a studio and they all do it. Now I’m off to play more Tiny Terraces

But they didn’t even have to shutter many of the studios. Many of them were profitable. Microsoft just didn’t want the competition and they decided the studios weren’t obscenely profitable

And just to extend, this doesn’t just apply to AAA games or anything. Like look how much people fell in love with and lovingly memed the placeholder art in “Slay the Spire II”. Or how much players are still captivated by the story and feel of “What Remains of Edith Finch”.

There’s plenty of examples of solo devs doing it too, just not as shiny. “Balatro”, “Axiom Verge”, “Return of the Obra Dinn”, “Stardew Valley”… I could go on. People like lovingly crafted things of any size