• 0 Posts
  • 154 Comments
Joined 21 days ago
cake
Cake day: April 23rd, 2026

help-circle












  • Opposing Hezbollah’s immediate disarmament is not equivalent to consent to enter the war of Israel against Palestine.

    Why would 58% of Lebanese would support Hezbollah maintaining it’s arm other than to be used against the Israeli threat?

    Just rolling with how loosely you seemingly use the term. Israel may be colonialists in general, but in the specific context of Israel vs Hezbollah they are clearly not.

    Israel want to create a greater Israel which include Lebanon. Hezbollah rocket was thrown on Shaba farms, Lebanese occupied land . It was not a mere support for Palestine. Not to mention Israel constantly breach the resolution 1701 yearly

    The French government being the democratically elected government representing the French people and territory signed an alliance with the Polish government.

    An alliance mean both side of the alliance has the obligation to protect the other when attacked but it doesn’t mean an aggression on Poland is an aggression on France. France attacked Nazi Germany before Nazi Germany attacked . France had a treaty of Poland exactly because the threat was real , they didn’t wait for the nazi to have one less resisting country because intervening. My last sentence was my main point because it is similar to Hezbollah not waiting for Palestine to be completely destroyed then wait for Israel to occupy and colonize Lebanon again.

    If you think Hezbollah is dragging Lebanon into the fight without consent, then France dragged themselves into the war by signing a mutual defense alliance with Poland


  • Hezbollah had the legitimacy of a resistance group until they defeated the Israeli occupation of Lebanon. Hezbollah has legitimacy until Israel abandon the greater Israel projects and stop being a threat to Lebanon .

    58% to 64% of the Lebanese population opposing Hezbollah’s immediate disarmament unless a guaranteed national defense strategy is established which do not exists. The government and the Lebanese army is inept to project Lebanon

    And their support of Assad and his Alawite oppression of Syria made them colonizers in their own right.

    Yes Hezbollah aggressed and murdered some Syrian civilians and it is condemnable, fighting groups financed by other foreign powers was also a motivation but again the context is the colonial power Israel vs Hezbollah. You don’t seem to understand the difference between colonialism and occupation either.

    In the example of WW2 that you brought up, Soviet forces were the resistance fighters against Nazi aggression and colonization right until the point that Germany surrendered.

    I was talking during WW2 against the axis not after Germany surrendered. I love how you also ignore France and Britain and only focus on the soviet. France did not wait for Germany to start aggressing it to declare and attacking war on the Nazis. Same with Hezbollah they will not wait Israel deciding to colonize before addressing the threat. Nobody would have used to the dumb rhetoric of both are aggressors , both are bad in context of world war 2.



  • Even in 2023 Israel was the aggressor. In response to Israel geocoding Palestinians Hezbollah launched rockets on occupied land, Israel went and targeted civilians infrastructures and Lebanese civilians . Israel is the colonial genocidal power , Hezbollah is the resistance group no amount of bullshit from your side is going to change that.

    1982 Israel occupied Lebanon, Israel is the aggressor, 2006 Israel had Lebanese is jail, Israel is the aggressor, post 2026 Israel continued bombing Lebanese in breach of the resolution 1701 , Israel was the aggressor, 2026 Israel continued bombing Lebanon despite a cease fire, again Israel the aggressor.

    Trying to look for simplistic good vs bad framing might be appealing but is ultimately dishonest.

    Again the context in this post is Hezbollah vs Israel . Israel is the colonial genocidal power , Hezbollah is the resistance group.

    Trying to look for simplistic good vs bad framing might be appealing but is ultimately dishonest.

    You are trying to frame the debate as both are aggressors to reject Hezbollah right to resistance which would allow Israel to occupy under pretext of security, then start putting settlers and finally after few years declare sovereignty on those land. My stand is more nuanced with facts. I did acknowledge that Hezbollah did atrocities but in the context of the war still in the context of the post Israel is the only aggressor.


  • Your problem is insisting to pick a side.

    Your problem is not picking a side. You a have 3 options . Israel the colonial genocidal power threatening the whole region with more colonization regardless of anything, the useless Lebanese army who let Israel occupy with no push back in 82 and in 2006, 2026 and Hezbollah who is a resistance groups. Israel killed multiple Lebanese soldiers , the army did not retaliate . You can support Hezbollah right to defend the Lebanese state while condemning any atrocities they commit.

    That’s some serious mental gymnastics

    It is called context, something you lack. I condemn the target of civilians of all sides during the Syrian civil war including Hezbollah.

    Why are the only two options “good and bad” or “equally bad” Both sides can be bad while being differently bad.

    Context again . Nazi germany was a bigger threat in world war 2. The only aggressor in the context was the axis

    And some of the allies in WW2 were definitely bad, especially the Soviet Union, who just replaced one occupying force in Eastern Europe with another.

    Also France and the British empire two of the bloodiest colonial power