Peter thiel is everything wrong with the world.

He is a plague, a cancer, a curse.

He is in the Epstein files.

He likely had his gay lover killed for revealing he was gay.

Peter thiel is the enemy of humanity.

Peter thiel is an antichrist

I agree that it should be able to infer the intent, but I stand by that it remain somewhat unclear and open to interpretation. Eg, If such language was used in a legal contract, it would not be enough to simply say, well, they should understand what I meant.

The people doing this test, I’m sure, are not linguistic masters, nor legal scholars.

There are lines of work where clarity is essential.

And what if my question actually was asking, should I just go for a walk instead of driving that far?

I know the answer. But as 30% demonstrated, clarity IS needed.

Understanding the intent of the question *and understanding why it could be interpreted differently *\and understanding why is it is a poorly phrased question:

There are 3 sentences.

I want to wash my car. No location or method is specified. No ‘at the car wash’. No ‘take my car to the car wash’ . No ‘take the car through the car wash’

A car wash is this far. Is this an option? A question. A suggestion. A demand?

Should I walk or drive? To do what? Wash the car? Ok. If the car wash is an option, that seems very far. But walking there seems silly. Since no method or location for washing the car was mentioned I could wash my own car.

Do you see how this works?

Yes, you can infer what was implied, but the question itself offers no certainty that what you infer is what it is actually implying.

Understanding the intent of the question *and understanding why it could be interpreted differently *\and understanding why is it is a poorly phrased question are not related to autism. (In my case)

I want to wash my car. No location or method is specified. No ‘at the car wash’. No ‘take my car to the car wash’ . No ‘take the car through the car wash’

A car wash is this far. Is this an option? A question. A suggestion. A demand?

Should I walk or drive? To do what? Wash the car? Ok. If the car wash is an option, that seems very far. But walking there seems silly. Since no method or location for washing the car was mentioned I could wash my own car.

Do you see how this works?

Yes, you can infer what was implied, but the question itself offers no certainty that what you infer is what it is actually implying.

Without reading the article, the title just says wash the car.

I could go for a walk and wash my car in my driveway.

Reading the article… That is exactly the question asked. It is a very ambiguous question.

*I do understand the intent of the question, but it could be phrased more clearly.

You know, it wasn’t always like this

Not very long ago, just before your time
Right before the towers fell, circa '99
This was catalogs, travel blogs, a chatroom or two
We set our sights and spent our nights waiting
For you, you, insatiable you
Mommy let you use her iPad, you were barely two
And it did all the things we designed it to do
Now, look at you, oh, ha, look at you
You, you, unstoppable, watchable
Your time is now, your inside’s out, honey, how you grew
And if we stick together, who knows what we’ll do?
It was always the plan
to put the world in your hand

~ Bo Burnham

Welcome to the Internet

Hardware will be available, silly. ^†

You will have the “freedom” ^‡ to choose from the hardware vendor* you want. Like always! ^‡‡

^{† For $49.95 per month.}

^Terms and conditions and government social score apply.^

^‡‡ ^Authorized and approved by the department of national security and intelligence gathering agencies and the billionaire technofascist bros clubh^

Repos can get / have been hacked/malicious code injected.

I swear the friendly future I had hoped of as a kid in the 80s/90s was either all propaganda, hijacked, or we actually did end up in an alternate timeline of pure fuckery.

This is not the future I evangelized.

And yeah, those of us who grew up through it have seen the horrific turn of things have taken from potential world changing awesome humanity, to absolute evil.

I think the happy comes with the unsaid “or else”

You be happy or you be soylent.

In 2030 you will own nothing.

And you will be happy.

For future reference and for the sake of your privacy, the link to the item is simply this:

https://www.ebay.com/itm/133582253643?_skw=full+face+sunglasses

The rest is tracking data.

This had become my favorite end of the world song and I hate that I have a favorite end of the world song that is so on the nose.

20,0004 years of this.

7 3 More to go.

I’m Canadian ans live near a fairly large US city.

I only use OTA and sites that sail the high seas.

My 20$ antenna gets me between 50 - 60 channels - weather and season dependent.

If/when OTA dies, my TV will never be used again.

I did goatsee that coming.

Hypothetically… Would doing hot knives of hash create enough heat to to so?

Water to rinse once hit.

Lemon juice (on a rag or bandana as make shift mask) and milk (soothes).

Wear Layers of clothing. Remove contaminated.

Heavy gloves - leather. Canisters get VERY hot.

Stay upwind if possible. They’ll try to move you with the wind.

Don’t look up. Wear face obscuring and impact resistant glasses and mask.

No makeup or contact lenses. Chemical warfare will fuck that shit up.

Yes, I’ve done this before.

A couple short stories on the matter:

Or

The Last Question - Isaac Asimov

https://xpressenglish.com/our-stories/the-last-question/

nothing; Good

A semicolon saves the day.