In a high-level, you don’t design them anymore. You write them, in code. The compiler turns your code into the chip masks, and has an optimizer that will mangle the hell out of the relatively simple stuff you wrote.
In a lower level, that compilation is not really done automatically, and people will intervene in lots of places, and AFAIK, how people divide it and interact with it are well guarded secrets from the chip makers.
I don’t think on this specific case anybody has given him anything.
Again, I don’t really understand anything about what he’s thinking. But on the case of Argentina the money seems to be flowing the other way around, and on the case of Brazil the president would reap lots of benefits if Trump antagonized him further.
Hum… Trump has been throwing lavish praise on Brazil too recently.
He may have discovered that the US can’t stay rich by isolating themselves. But he has been praising countries that are mostly economic competitors, instead of customers or suppliers. I don’t understand how he thinks.
It’s probably closer to legality than the Executive branch ordering presidency propaganda there.
Ouch, I never even considered the idea of private prosecution in criminal courts. Looks like a remedy that is worse than the disease.
It doesn’t matter if there are entire battalions of lawyers looking for it. Persecutors have the monopoly on getting people charged with crimes.
The other question you can ask is: why isn’t the entire press on fire complaining about government workers committing crimes all day over all over the country?
Well, we got the plug that is correct both ways…
Yeah, the law was made for micro-USB and USB-C is a mess…
To make it worse, some companies decided the top voltage would be 18V, while others use 21V or anything in between… So it’s not clear if the power brick you brought, that satisfies all the numbers from the device will actually be useful to charge the device.
When Samsung did that around here (claiming they were importing the idea from the EU), they sent people the charger for free if they asked. They started including the charger again later, so I guess it wasn’t very well received.
But well, shortly after, when Apple did it, and charged people $15 for the charger, they were heavily fined.
Probably. But tariffs are also valid in one market or another, if you make them while thinking. They are way to manipulate the comparative advantages.
(And no, international trade is not a competition. It’s not “competitive advantages” that you are looking for. It’s much more complicated and much less threatening than that.)
He hadn’t done that since people told him about the joke.
It’s surreal for a politician to manage to make an apology in a way that makes people even more angry than they were originally.
They are protecting their domestic food production.
Rice prices are high mostly because their government forced farmers to diversify their crops. What means they won’t go hungry if something bad happens.
They just can’t have all the things at the same time.
Anything can be “pseudo”-any other thing if you apply enough pressure on the definitions.
Also, honest question: Are you cake?
Yes, every fossil fuel producer is trying to get most of the shrinking market that they know won’t last for long and will never be back. And that means that the most expensive producers will just go out of business.
Were you really expecting global warming to be avoided by the fossil fuel sellers not trying to make a profit?
It kinda is.
There exist a hierarchy of needs, it’s a subjective one but all people share a large part of it. There also exists a very objective and measurable hierarchy of production.
Interpreting that as “low-herarchy factors are X” is useless and dishonest unless X means “things we need to prioritize in a crisis”. And saying any of that comes from Marxism or any kind of communist theory is just bullshit.
At the end of the day all governments are desperately afraid of making people angry (at them), from the healthiest democracy to the most totalitarian dictatorship
One would think so. But a quick glance at Russia, or even the current US one would show you otherwise.
Most governments don’t seem to pay a lot of attention to it. Democracies tend to be the most concerned ones, but it still varies a lot.
China seems very stable to me. Their government is afraid of making people angry, and removing basic help like that is very likely to make people angry.
But also, it seems to me that the “generally” in “generally free” is doing some work. AFAIK, some care is free, some care isn’t. And the pretty good quality of life doesn’t seem to be universally distributed. Both of those seem to be improving quickly, but the “people are better than in the US” impression one may take from that comment seems to be a misrepresentation.
The last plane that was lost due to collision with Venus was wild!