data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8fb96/8fb96bbcae8674d596d5d0010c06cc0bcc8b1f6b" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1df69/1df69f53f5559e83c288e08b403109544e78dc05" alt=""
I’m not very familiar with those services but are they not relying on YouTube, and therefore still YouTube in a way?
edit before anyone argues, I know these alternative frontends bring many privacy advantages and many usability advantages (and disadvantages). But the content still comes from YouTube which is what my argument is about. I wouldn’t say an alternative frontend (or client for that matter) is not using YouTube…
UI =/= UX, and UX is what the comment on the post was about