Lka1988

Literally just tribalism. Trump is on “their team”, therefore whatever he says is good.

Oh, for sure.

The logic being: I’d rather be killed by a fascist psycho than not be helped as much as I want by a way more moderate person, that isn’t actively supporting killing me

That’s too much logical thought.

Much closer to “woman not like me bad, man like me good” than anything else.

Can, or can’t?

Yeah. This isn’t the first time we as taxpayers have paid for “infrastructure upgrades” with nothing to show for it. They straight up pocketed the money.

Valid point. MAGA is just the latest iteration.

MAGA would be screaming about it until the end of time if that happened. Because it’s different. Somehow.

I keep saying this, but that sorry excuse of a man will launch nukes before ever admitting to fucking children.

Because the 2A nutjobs were always just that - nutjobs, looking for an excuse to kill people they don’t like.

That’s what you got from this?

People who didn’t vote for Harris didn’t choose Trump, they just rejected Harris.

This is part of why the 2-party system we’re currently stuck with is so problematic.

Again - that is a claim. Bring a source next time.

We’re in a thread talking about the only other choice we had for president vs Trump, because of what Trump is doing as president, and you’re going “well aCkShYuALLy” about it.

When faced with two choices (which itself is a problem that needs to be addressed), the American people picked the fascist pedophile over “woman who laughs weird” (something the GOP actually tried to use against her during their campaign).

she was also an american imperialist she made that clear.

If you’ve got any proof of that claim, lay it out for us. As someone who does not pledge allegiance to any politician in any way, shape, or form whatsoever, I would be very interested to see what you’ve got.

Yes, the fascist orange Nazi pedophile with dementia was a much better choice.

The point is to enrich the wealthy few. That’s it. Follow the money.

Pretty fucking rich coming from the same country who forcibly “colonized” every nation they came across over the last millennia.

I’ve yet to see right wing movements bring lasting positive change to any angry or discontented country

Because that’s not the point. The point is to enrich the wealthy few.

Lest we forget: “Right-wing” stems from “right-hand man”, i.e. a monarch’s yes-man most trusted advisor.

You know what though? That is more than the US has ever done with high-ranking politicians.

This doesn’t kill the crab

That’s a valid point.